Search for: "C/O Givens" Results 41 - 60 of 2,823
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2024, 5:03 am by Simon Lester
Chapter 26 (Dispute settlement) does not apply to the interpretation of te Tiriti o Waitangi / the Treaty of Waitangi, including as to the nature of the rights and obligations arising under it. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 5:03 am by Simon Lester
Chapter 26 (Dispute settlement) does not apply to the interpretation of te Tiriti o Waitangi / the Treaty of Waitangi, including as to the nature of the rights and obligations arising under it. [read post]
23 Mar 2024, 7:47 am by Rob Robinson
The Institute for the Study of War (ISW) is a 501(c)(3) organization and produces strictly non-partisan, non-ideological, fact-based research. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 9:35 am by Rob Robinson
The Institute for the Study of War (ISW) is a 501(c)(3) organization and produces strictly non-partisan, non-ideological, fact-based research. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 9:22 am by Dennis Crouch
The current list is short – just four nations, including China: (A) the Democratic People’s Republic of North Korea; (B) the People’s Republic of China (C)the Russian Federation; and (D)the Islamic Republic of Iran. 10 U.S.C. 4872(d)(2). [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 8:17 am by Kalvis Golde
United States 23-524Issues: (1) Whether the president can use an Antiquities Act Proclamation to override Congress’ plain text in the Oregon and California Railroad and Coos Bay Wagon Road Grant Lands Act of 1937 to repurpose vast swaths of O&C Act timberlands as a national monument where sustained-yield timber production is prohibited; and (2) whether the secretary of the interior can override the O&C Act by designating 80% of… [read post]
9 Mar 2024, 6:50 am by Rob Robinson
The Institute for the Study of War (ISW) is a 501(c)(3) organization and produces strictly non-partisan, non-ideological, fact-based research. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
C. 20543,pio@supremecourt.gov, of any typographical or other formal errors.SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATESNo. 23–719DONALD J. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 1:19 am by INFORRM
The claim related to a publication on the defendant’s website in around June 2019, and for about six months thereafter, of the following words: “The British Boxing Board of Control – Southern Area Council – June 2019 Notices – Regulation 25 – Jeff Hinds Given Words of Advice for the future. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 6:52 am by Kevin LaCroix
Musk Sues Open AI, Sam Altman Over the Firm’s Profit: Given the clash of the titans aspect of the lawsuit, it is easy to overlook the fact that the complaint that Elon Musk filed last week against Open AI, its CEO and founder Sam Altman, and its co-founder Greg Brockman, is also a D&O lawsuit. [read post]
2 Mar 2024, 6:26 am by Rob Robinson
The Institute for the Study of War (ISW) is a 501(c)(3) organization and produces strictly non-partisan, non-ideological, fact-based research. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 2:29 pm by Keith Szeliga and Emily Theriault
The standard for reasonableness depends on whether the compensation is paid in accordance with an “arm’s length” labor-management agreement negotiated pursuant to the Federal Labor Relations Act or similar state statutes.[9] Costs of compensation established under covered labor-management agreements are deemed reasonable unless the costs are “unwarranted” by the character and circumstances of the work or “discriminatory” against the Government.[10] The… [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 8:44 am by Eric S. Solotoff
Rather, notwithstanding the statutory mandate of the Prevention of Domestic Violence Act, the process must be fair for both parties, given the serious ramifications that go along with the entry of an FRO. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 1:10 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
SHOP SAFE wouldn’t change that b/c it is only about counterfeits. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 4:01 am by Rob Robinson
The Institute for the Study of War (ISW) is a 501(c)(3) organization and produces strictly non-partisan, non-ideological, fact-based research. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:04 pm by Howard Knopf
 “Mandy Aylen” Judge   The essence of the Consortium’s claim as stated by Justice Aylen in the very lengthy and detailed recitation of facts was this:   [36] On February 16, 2018, prior to the Supreme Court’s decision in York University, the Plaintiffs commenced this action against Access Copyright seeking, among other relief: (a) a declaration that Access Copyright’s tariffs as certified by the Board are not mandatory; (b) a declaration that the… [read post]