Search for: "C Janues" Results 41 - 60 of 128
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2014, 2:36 pm by Eleonora Rosati
The presentations were followed by discussion with the audience and panelists Kristina Janušauskaitė (IFPI), Jan Bernd Nordemann (Boehmert & Boehmert, Berlin) and Silke von Lewinski (Max Planck Institute for Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Munich). [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
  As Broc subsequently blogged, the SEC responded to Janus by emphasizing its view that 10b-5(a) & (c) had a more expansive reach. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 11:26 am by Ronald Mann
A majority of the justices (including all four of the dissenters from the 5-4 decision in Janus) hold that Lorenzo is liable. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 4:11 am by Broc Romanek
If Rule 10b-5(a) and (c) can be used to circumvent the “maker” requirement of Rule 10b-5(b) under Janus, private plaintiffs could potentially bring securities fraud actions against individuals who are otherwise only minimally connected to the misstatement. [read post]
15 Jul 2021, 10:11 am by Jonathan H. Adler
But then in Janus, the Supreme Court overruled Abood, and said that "[c]ompelling individuals to mouth support for views they find objectionable" violates the First Amendment. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 6:59 pm by Lyle Roberts
” In a vigorous dissent, Justice Thomas (joined by Justice Gorsuch)), argued that the majority decision “eviscerates” the Janus distinction between primary and secondary liability. [read post]
17 Aug 2007, 1:02 am
While we should of course support the vital work that these groups perform, we should not be blinded to their shortcomings because of their humanitarian nature.On a related note, a study recently reported in the Economist argues that "[c]harity is just as 'selfish' as self-indulgence. [read post]
10 May 2018, 2:55 am by Walter Olson
” [Chris Edwards, Cato on Janus v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 11:23 am by Charles Gallmeyer
Justice Clarence Thomas, joined by Justice Gorsuch, dissented on the grounds that the majority “eviscerate[d] th[e] distinction” between primary and secondary liability that the court had created in Janus Capital Group, Inc. v. [read post]