Search for: "C Pineda"
Results 41 - 60
of 69
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jan 2011, 5:00 am
The first case argued was Pineda v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 3:51 am
Pineda-Buenaventura, 622 F.3d 761, 777 (7th Cir. 2010) (stating that officers have a duty to inquire further as to a third party's authority only "when the circumstances make the authority questionable in the first place"). [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 10:34 am
This one or Pineda-Moreno (posted here and here (on denial of rehearing en banc))? [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 2:48 am
Pineda-Moreno is here. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 9:01 pm
Pineda-Moreno, 591 F.3d 1212, 1216 (9th Cir. 2010); United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 4:13 am
Pineda-Moreno, 591 F.3d 1212, 1217 (9th Cir. 2010). [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 9:16 am
Pineda v. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 12:47 pm
” Pineda v. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 2:57 am
Pineda-Buenaventura, 2010 U.S. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
App. 2007) (adopting Restatement Third §2(c) regarding warnings; “[a]bsent controlling Arizona law to the contrary, we generally follow the Restatement”); Southwest Pet Products, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 6:10 pm
Pineda-Moreno, 591 F.3d 1212 (9th Cir. 2010), like it just happened yesterday? [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 3:36 pm
Pineda-Moreno, 591 F.3d 1212 (9th Cir. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 8:15 pm
Pineda-Moreno, 591 F.3d 1212 (9th Cir. 2010); United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 11:46 am
Pineda-Moreno, 591 F.3d 1212 (9th Cir. 2010); United States v. [read post]
14 May 2010, 4:21 am
., Pineda v. [read post]
11 May 2010, 3:25 am
Pineda v. [read post]
3 Apr 2010, 7:20 am
Pineda-Moreno, 591 F.3d 1212, 1216 (9th Cir. 2010) (citing United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 5:38 am
Pineda, 2010 U.S. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:26 pm
Pineda, No. 08-41301 The $100 special assessment portion of the district court's order revoking defendant's supervised release for illegal reentry into the U.S. is vacated where the district court erred in reimposing the unpaid assessment from defendant's sentence for a prior offense, because neither 18 U.S.C. section 3013 nor 18 U.S.C. section 3583, which concerned supervised release, sanctioned the imposition of a section 3013 assessment for revocation of a term of supervised release. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:26 pm
Pineda, No. 08-41301 The $100 special assessment portion of the district court's order revoking defendant's supervised release for illegal reentry into the U.S. is vacated where the district court erred in reimposing the unpaid assessment from defendant's sentence for a prior offense, because neither 18 U.S.C. section 3013 nor 18 U.S.C. section 3583, which concerned supervised release, sanctioned the imposition of a section 3013 assessment for revocation of a term of… [read post]
