Search for: "C. L. DANIELS"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,422
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Oct 2023, 9:05 pm
L. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 6:50 pm
Schroeder, Jean L. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 5:55 am
Nat’l Sec. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 4:30 am
Union Avoidance and Organizing: Employer Strategies (Part 2) Video – by Daniel V. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 8:58 am
The law defines "sexual material harmful to minors" as including any material that "(A) the average person applying contemporary community standards would find, taking the material as a whole is and designed to appeal or pander to the prurient interest" to minors, (B) is patently offensive to minors, and (C) "taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value for minors. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 3:52 pm
427-468 (available here) Balbi, Francesca “La circolazione delle decisioni a livello globale: il rogetto di convenzione della Conferenza dell’Aia per il riconoscimento e l’esecuzione delle sentenze straniere” (Tesi di dottorato, Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca, 2019; available: here) Beaumont, Paul “Forum non Conveniens and the EU rules on Conflicts of Jurisdiction: A Possible Global Solution”, Revue Critique de Droit International… [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 1:19 pm
Schwab Daniel Schwank Coleman L. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 7:45 pm
These, then, describe the insides of traditional cages of the system (制度的笼子里 (zhìdù de lóngzi lî) constituted as the domains of law, of authority, and of the foundational norms through which they are tested, assessed, and legitimated. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
National/Federal ‘Biased. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
Daniel Deacon & Leah Litman, The New Major Questions Doctrine, 109 Va. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 10:52 am
Lohr, Nicole C. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 3:00 am
Michael Stokes Paulsen and I have a new draft article: The Sweep and Force of Section Three, that is forthcoming in the Pennsylvania Law Review. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 1:25 am
By Richard T. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 11:40 pm
Bad Spaniels (L), Jack Daniel's (R) ...Whereas the District Court had initially found in favour of Jack Daniel’s, rejecting VIP's nominative fair use and First Amendment defences, the Ninth Circuit, on appeal, reversed the District Court’s decision in favour of VIP Products, ruling that (as previously reported by the IPKat):Bad Spaniels was an “expressive work” protected by the First Amendment; andthat there was no dilution of Jack… [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 12:04 pm
’ §1125(c)(3)(A). [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 11:54 am
’ §1125(c)(3)(A). [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 11:46 am
’ §1125(c)(3)(A). [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
Feltman-Frank, and Daniel L. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
Feltman-Frank, and Daniel L. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
Alison L. [read post]