Search for: "C. Moore"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,692
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Sep 2023, 10:59 pm
He was joined by Judge Moore (who dissented in Jackson) and Judge Stranch (who evidently has misgivings about Jackson but nonetheless felt bound by the decision at the panel stage). [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 4:16 pm
They simply had "behavioral problems" that LA County thought meant that they wouldn't be quickly (or perhaps ever) adopted.But, as Justice Moor rightly holds, that's irrelevant. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 1:18 pm
§ 3106(c))). [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 8:20 pm
Dana C. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 5:40 am
Under the Age 29 Law, a parent’s health insurance serves as the basis for coverage for an eligible adult child who has otherwise aged off of the parent’s policy.Appellate Division, Second DepartmentChild Support Order reversed where Support Magistrate erred in failing to advise the pro se mother that she had “an absolute right to be represented by counsel at the hearing at her own expense and that she was entitled to an adjournment to retain the services of an attorney In… [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 1:03 pm
A: b/c it’s not a substitute—it appeals to a different market. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 12:22 pm
Benjamin Moore & Co. (2023 CAF 168). [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
Stein and Anthony C. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 4:54 pm
Although, in the words of Lord Moore-Bick, J, the two prongs often merge in inquiry as “identification of the system of law with which the agreement has its closest and most real connection is likely to be an important factor in deciding whether the parties have made an implied choice of proper law” [para 25]. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 10:50 am
” My colleague Jill Moore blogged about these changes more extensively on the Coates’ Canons NC Local Government Law blog. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 8:32 am
Smith might never get her website up and running, or that (b) same-sex couples would never actually request her services, or that (c) she would discourage—strongly—said couples, but not actually refuse them service. 1. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 11:38 pm
C. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
In an important 1961 article in the Harvard Law Review, Yale Law Professor Alexander Bickel—who was a leading constitutional scholar of his generation—defended the Supreme Court’s exercise of what he called “the passive virtues. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 3:35 am
& Maurice C. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 10:54 pm
In Moore v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 11:00 am
The court gave a detailed exegesis of that case, Moore v. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 3:37 pm
’” In the same vein, Kavanaugh noted that Moore’s treatise relies on Griggs for the view that a “‘stay in these circumstances’ is ‘the sounder approach,’” while Wright & Miller opine that a “‘complete stay of district-court proceedings pending appeal from a refusal to order arbitration is desirable’ because ‘[c]ontinued trial-court proceedings pending appeal could lead to an entirely wasted trial if… [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 6:28 am
In this Moore County case, the Supreme Court per curiam affirmed and modified State v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 5:21 am
Madalyn Moore, a 2023 summer associate, assisted in the preparation of this post. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
Second, the book insists that “nullification” was not part of original interpositionism but began to develop only in the early decades of the nineteenth century under the spur of slavery and ultimately the leadership of John C. [read post]
