Search for: "C. R. C." Results 41 - 60 of 58,380
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2024, 12:46 am by Emmanuel Barthe
En réalité, explique Le Monde, c'est un marqueur d'un système de prédation, que les chercheurs qualifient de « contrôle coercitif ». [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 5:50 am by Berke Gursoy
§ 875(c) prohibiting the transmitting in interstate or foreign commerce any threat to kidnap or injure another person. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Sachs, Good and Evil in the American Founding: The 2023 Vaughan Lecture on America's Founding Principles, (Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, Forthcoming).Jonathan Crowe, Natural Law with and without God, ((2024) 4 Australian Journal of Law and Religion 17).Jamie R. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 2:08 am by Etienne Farnoux
scrutinizes the recent decision of the Tribunal judiciaire de Paris regarding the interim measures requested in the Total-Ouganda case under French law on corporate duty of care – “loi sur le devoir de vigilance” (TJ Paris, référé, 28 févr. 2023). [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 9:40 am by Giles Peaker
The Council’s case is rather that the duty came to an end under subsection (6)(c) as a result of Mr Querino accepting its offer. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 4:00 am by SOQUIJ
Intitulé : D’Amours c. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 5:11 am by Michael Oykhman
Examples of acts which have, in the past, met the actus reus standard for a section 86 offence include: Storing a firearm in a glovebox (see: R v Patrick, 2007 CanLII 7579 (ONSC)) Storing a firearm in a dresser (see: R v McDonald, 2016 BCSC 1648 (CanLII)) Storing a firearm by a furnace (see: R v Roussel, 2014 ABQB 202 (CanLII)) The Guilty Mind (Mens Rea) The mens rea or the guilty mind speaks to the accused’s degree of intent during the argued commission of the… [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 4:20 am by Jonathan Santman (Brinkhof)
The court dismisses this request because it regards R. 158 RoP only applicable in main proceedings. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 7:21 am by Michael Oykhman
Regarding a reasonable expectation of privacy, a recent decision by the Supreme Court of Canada in R v Jarvis, 2019 SCC 10 noted that people have a reasonable expectation of privacy in an area, location or circumstance if the person does not expect to be secretly recorded or observed. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 5:50 am by Michael Oykhman
Call Now 1-866-939-5940Overview of the Offence The relevant provision for child pornography in the Code is 163.1 (1): 163.1 (1) In this section, child pornography means (a) a photographic, film, video or other visual representation, whether or not it was made by electronic or mechanical means, (i) that shows a person who is or is depicted as being under the age of eighteen years and is engaged in or is depicted as engaged in explicit sexual activity, or (ii) the… [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 5:27 am by Michael Oykhman
This was discussed in the case of R v McSween (2020), ONCA 343 (CanLII). [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 3:32 am by JR Chaves
Segundo, como la doctrina que se le pide es sobre el sentido del silencio se centra en este enfoque y afirma: En cuanto al silencio administrativo, el Real Decreto 1777/1994, de 5 de agosto, sigue siendo aplicable para adecuar el régimen de la Ley 39/2015 a los procedimientos en materia de gestión de personal. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 11:22 am by Marie-Thérèse Eugénio (FR)
Dans notre précédent blog du 13 février 2024, nous avions évoqué le revirement de jurisprudence opéré par la Cour de Cassation concernant les règles applicables aux congés payés des salariés en arrêt maladie. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 2:31 am by Marie-Thérèse Eugénio
Dans notre précédent blog du 13 février 2024, nous avions évoqué le revirement de jurisprudence opéré par la Cour de Cassation concernant les règles applicables aux congés payés des salariés en arrêt maladie. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 3:47 am by Michael Oykhman
The case of R v ML, 2021 NBCA 27 also stated that the actus reus is made out where a “reasonable person aware of the circumstances would perceive the words as a threat of death or bodily harm”. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
§501(c)(6), non-charitable business leagues are entitled to federal income tax exemption and may engage in political lobbying activities that are off limits to charitable nonprofit organizations exempt under §501(c)(3). [read post]