Search for: "C. W. Garland" Results 41 - 60 of 65
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Sep 2016, 7:49 am by Victoria Kwan
C-Span has made video of the lecture available online. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 7:57 am by Amy Howe
Coverage related to the death of Justice Antonin Scalia and the nomination of Chief Judge Merrick Garland to succeed him comes from Kevin Diaz of Houston Chronicle, who reports that Texas Governor Greg Abbott sided “with Senate Republicans who have refused to hold hearings on Merrick Garland” and “also took a shot at Chief Justice John Roberts, who was appointed to the court by former President George W. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 12:06 pm by Hannah Kiddoo
Thursdays, September 10 and September 24 Garland (Salvation Army—457 W. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 4:45 pm by Barry Sookman
Chauhan, the head of Content Protection for the MPAA-C, taught a course on the law affecting the creative industries. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
Strangelove" (16) "Flight of the Conchords" (4) "Game Change" (2) "Get Smart" (1) "Gran Torino" (10) "Grey Gardens" (13) "I Shouldn't Be Alive" (4) "Limelight" (3) "Meet the Press" (20) "Moby Dick" (5) "My Dinner with Andre" (34) "Mystery Science Theater" (2) "Project Runway" (78) "Romy and Michele's High School Reunion" (3) "Seinfeld" (72) "Sex and the City" (14) "Slacker" (11) "Slumdog Millionaire" (16) "SNL" (60) "Sopranos" (50) "South Park" (71) "Star Trek" (12) "Star Wars" (25) "Survivor" (50)… [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 12:59 am
Upon review, the Tenth Circuit affirmed the grants of summary judgment on the dormant Commerce Clause and preemption issues, and the dismissals based on standing and ripeness: [w]e hold that the Red River Compact insulates Oklahoma water statutes from dormant Commerce Clause challenge insofar as they apply to surface water subject to the Compact. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 6:22 am by admin
A claim for unjust enrichment is established once three elements are proven (Garland v. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 5:30 pm by Tom Goldstein
   No one — not even the most devoted members of the American Constitution Society — believes the answer is “c”. [read post]
5 May 2010, 6:40 am by Adam Chandler
As Bravin puts it, “[w]hen it comes to building buzz for a would-be high-court nominee, few are as useful as protégés who have gone on to higher places. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 10:24 am by Tom Goldstein
   No one — not even the most devoted members of the American Constitution Society — believes the answer is “c”. [read post]