Search for: "CALIFORNIA HUMAN DEVELOPMENT V US"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,214
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2020, 9:28 am
In Edwards Lifesciences v. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 9:28 am
In Edwards Lifesciences v. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 2:00 pm
(Knight v. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 8:37 am
Make UC A Good Neighbor v. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 11:30 am
Douda v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 12:19 pm
When human beings are involved, development is no less organic than nature. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 7:46 am
The State of California lists the glyphosate but the US Environmental Protection Agency [US EPA] does not. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 12:35 pm
v. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 1:57 pm
State of Washington (Treaty Right to Take Shellfish) California Valley Miwok Tribe v. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 8:35 am
Spy Phone Labs LLC. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 6:00 am
The California Supreme Court is widely credited as the originator of strict product liability as a means of tort recovery for its pronouncement in Greenman v Yuba Power Products, Inc. (1963) 59 Cal.2d 57, 62: "A manufacturer is strictly liable in tort when an article he places into the market, knowing that it is to be used without inspection for defects, proves to have a defect that caused injury to a human being. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 7:29 am
Development #5: A Novel Procedural Issue Is Put To The Test In EEOC v. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 5:06 pm
The California Supreme Court held last year in CBIA v BAAQMD that CEQA generally applies to a project’s impact on the environment, not the environment’s impact on the project. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 5:06 pm
The California Supreme Court held last year in CBIA v BAAQMD that CEQA generally applies to a project’s impact on the environment, not the environment’s impact on the project. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 12:50 pm
State of California (Gaming Compacts - Good Faith Negotiations)James Raymond Acres v. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 2:13 pm
King confirmed by US Senate to serve as federal district judge Indian tribes are governing well. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 3:00 am
(Schwartz v. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 1:46 pm
See Apple Inc. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 11:30 am
The purpose of the Collaboration Agreement was to develop a drug using dimethyl fumarate (DMF) to treat Friedreich’s ataxia, a rare neurodegenerative disorder. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 3:56 pm
Kamakahi v. [read post]