Search for: "CAUSE OF ACTION INSTITUTE v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE"
Results 41 - 60
of 384
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Nov 2007, 5:45 am
Samek for a "limited purpose" and, because he was not given the same information as defense experts Bernstein, Berlin and Shaw, the Circuit Court erred in basing its sentencing opinion on Dr. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 5:45 am
Samek for a "limited purpose" and, because he was not given the same information as defense experts Bernstein, Berlin and Shaw, the Circuit Court erred in basing its sentencing opinion on Dr. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 12:35 pm
United States — in which a splintered majority of the Supreme Court held that the CWA does not regulate all wetlands. [read post]
18 May 2021, 11:13 am
” “Section 1983” claims are the most common civil rights causes of action filed in federal courts against police officers and other state and local government officials. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 7:40 pm
In defense, respondent alleged the six-year limitation period provided in the 1939 Internal Revenue Code. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 6:48 pm
In defense, respondent alleged the six-year limitation period provided in the 1939 Internal Revenue Code. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 6:29 am
Finally, the doctrinal reason for not having the military commission review these two additional violations is found in United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 5:01 am
Most recently, in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 5:55 am
United States, and United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2019, 6:57 am
Ermini v. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
Plaintiff commenced this action in federal court against, among others, Miller, the police department, and the City of Binghamton (the City). [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
Plaintiff commenced this action in federal court against, among others, Miller, the police department, and the City of Binghamton (the City). [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 8:43 am
§ 1983, provides: Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State ... subjects ... any citizen of the United States ... to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law[.] [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 5:00 pm
Employer and union sponsored group health plans covered by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) and their insurers are not required to comply with a Vermont state law that requires health insurers and certain other parties to report payments relating to health care claims and other information relating to health care services to a state agency for compilation in an all-inclusive health care database, according to the United States Supreme… [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 3:55 am
NEW CENTURY MORTGAGE CORP., ET AL., No. 08-CV-377 (JFB) (MLO);UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK;2010 U.S. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 6:22 am
The Department of Homeland Security instituted removal proceedings against the children. [read post]
19 May 2015, 9:05 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Town of Barnstable v. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 6:20 pm
Since the Institutes, in th [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 3:57 pm
Further, I believe that the intellectual property regime as instituted in the United States and most other countries provides incentives that have made the United States competitive in the global marketplace. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 11:26 am
Matthew Tokson analyzed federal and state judgments applying Carpenter v. [read post]
