Search for: "CHAMBERS v. COX"
Results 41 - 60
of 61
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2012, 2:56 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Cox v Ergo Versicherung AG [2012] EWCA Civ 854 (25 June 2012) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Vallen International Limited v Lewis & Anor [2012] EWHC B5 (QB) (25 June 2012) AXN & Ors v Worboys & Ors [2012] EWHC 1730 (QB) (25 June 2012) The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd & Anor, R (on the application of) v Environment Agency [2012] EWHC 1643 (QB) (20 June 2012) High Court (Chancery… [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:04 am
The full list of resolved complaints from last week: Mr Peter Reynolds v The Mail on Sunday, Clause 1, 20/04/2012; Samaritans, Mind, Rethink Mental Illness, Sane and PAPYRUS Prevention of Young Suicide v The Sun, Clause 5, 19/04/2012; Mr Adam Stephens v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 19/04/2012; Mr Peter Reynolds v Harborough Mail, Clause 1, 19/04/2012; Mrs Drene Brown v Scunthorpe Telegraph, Clause 1, 19/04/2012; A woman v Hastings and St Leonards… [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 11:48 pm
Firstly, the IPCC and the Metropolitan Police v The Guardian (clause 1). [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:30 am
The first, Gold v Cox ([2012] EWHC 272 (QB)) concerned the threatened publication of a book about Jacqueline Gold, the chief executive of Ann Summers. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 2:51 am
The Permanent Editorial Board of the Uniform Law Institute (you know what that is if you listened to my recent podcast with attorney Thomas Cox), has just a few days ago published a paper rendering an opinion on the Article 3 v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 10:06 am
Tingdene Holiday Parks Ltd v Cox and others [2011] UKUT 310 (LC)By s.21B, Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, a demand for the payment of service charges must be “accompanied” by a summary of rights and obligations of tenants in relation to the same. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 10:06 am
Tingdene Holiday Parks Ltd v Cox and others [2011] UKUT 310 (LC)By s.21B, Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, a demand for the payment of service charges must be “accompanied” by a summary of rights and obligations of tenants in relation to the same. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 1:03 pm
That was the case in Cox v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 9:25 am
Idly fumbling through the electronic annals of Parliament House, the humble case of Daniel Cox v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 8:00 am
We are done for now discussing the Brief submitted by the Business Roundtable and Chamber of Commerce in the shareholder access case. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 8:05 am
Janine Cox won in State v. [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 7:34 am
Latest Regulatory Decisions Latest decisions of the Scottish Information Commissioner Latest Decision Notices from the Information Commissioner’s Office Latest decisions of the First-tier Tribunal, General Regulatory Chamber [Information Rights] David Cox v IC EA/2010/0092. [read post]
2 Oct 2010, 4:26 pm
(See this earlier post for the text of the original Constitution adopted in 1789, and see in particular Article V thereof.)Article I of the original Constitution established a "General Convention" -- a representative body composed of delegates ("deputies") elected and sent by the member dioceses, and (in a separate chamber, or "House") the bishops who headed up each member Diocese. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 9:07 pm
Chamber of Commerce, represented by Richard Bernstein and Barry Barbash of Willkie Farr Investment Company Institute, represented by Seth Waxman of WilmerHale Last month, the following amici filed in support of the petitioners Jones, et al.: Law Professors (specifically, the professors are Barbara Aldave, myself, Barbara Black, Douglas Branson, Jim Cox, Steven Davidoff, Lisa Fairfax, Jim Fanto, Jesse Fried, Theresa Gabaldon, Joan MacLeod Heminway, Don… [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 8:10 am
Cox Brainerd Currie Professor of Law Duke University School of Law Lawrence A. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
(IPKat) German Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) guidance regarding registrability of 'spa' in relation to beauty care products and spa services (Class 46) Europe ARMAFOAM: the ECJ rules on linguistic and changes OHIM's rules on conversion: Armacell v OHIM (CATCH US IF YOU CAN !!!) [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 3:36 am
Schwab v. [read post]
Non-Access, the SEC, and the Restrictions on Shareholder Rights: An Arbitrary Exercise of Rulemaking
14 Dec 2007, 5:15 am
See Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. [read post]
8 May 2007, 9:02 am
No. 06-273, Cox v. [read post]
