Search for: "CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE"
Results 41 - 60
of 88
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jan 2019, 3:45 am
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 7:08 am
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 6:30 am
But, of course, limiting the court’s jurisdiction to U.S. citizens leads to the inevitable question from other nations: why do our citizens deserve less from your government? [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 1:07 pm
Citing Stump v. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 11:56 am
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 9:17 am
.: The Carnegie Endowment for International Peace will hold a discussion on the differences and similarities between European and U.S. approaches to artificial intelligence. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 6:00 am
JOB DESCRIPTION Main Responsibilities Work with the IHL team to provide legal advice to the delegation in Washington, and to the ICRC as a whole on matters of IHL, human rights law, national security law, or other U.S. legal issues. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 11:58 am
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 12:54 pm
Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, 20-330, concerns whether business competitors of the Trump International Hotel have the right to sue the then-president under the foreign and domestic emoluments clauses. [read post]
4 Nov 2024, 6:39 am
The Department of Justice appealed that ruling to the U.S. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 1:14 pm
The voters are represented by (among other lawyers) Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, an ethics watchdog group that sued Trump while he was still in the White House, accusing him of violating the Constitution’s ban on receiving payments from foreign and state governments through his operation of a hotel in Washington, D.C. [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 3:00 am
The Justice Department said earlier this year that such blanket policies are illegal under federal civil rights laws. [read post]
29 Jul 2018, 4:50 pm
The Social Media Law Bulletin has posted on a matter of judicial ethics arising from the case U.S. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
The Washington, D.C., Rules of Professional Co [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
The letter described the alarm in the Justice Department as officials realized how serious the documents were. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 10:04 am
His attacks on the free press, the independent judiciary and the independence of the Department of Justice have all created significant damage. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 1:23 pm
The U.S. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 12:42 pm
.: American University Washington College of Law’s Tech, Law & Security Program will host Justice in Cyberspace: A Symposium, which seeks to examine current challenges to preventing, investigating, and prosecuting cyber and cyber-enabled crimes. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
The majority in Dobbs v. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 3:00 am
Supreme Court’s ruling in Dobbs v. [read post]
