Search for: "COMPANY Q v. USA" Results 41 - 46 of 46
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Apr 2013, 11:53 pm by Gretchen Goetz
“The company doesn’t attempt to defend its product, nor is it our role to defend their product. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 6:26 am
  Across the Federal Government, my Administration will support programs to provide Americans the skills they need for the age of AI and attract the world’s AI talent to our shores — not just to study, but to stay — so that the companies and technologies of the future are made in America. [read post]
27 May 2020, 6:31 am by David Kris
The executive branch believes that the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) does not apply to otherwise-authorized, military cyber activity, and the Supreme Court’s forthcoming decision on the CFAA in Van Buren v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 3:46 pm by Rick
  This is why a USA Today editorial argued, “NSA has your phone records; ‘trust us’ isn’t good enough. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 7:35 am by Cyberleagle
But it is not only about them: the government estimates that 24,000 companies and organisations will be in scope. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
But it is not only about them: the government estimates that 24,000 companies and organisations will be in scope. [read post]