Search for: "CONSUMER ECONOMIC LOSS PLAINTIFFS" Results 41 - 60 of 940
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2009, 8:35 pm
Until a few years ago, a plaintiff suing under California's Unfair Competition Law was not required to have suffered an economic loss in order to have standing to bring a UCL claim. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 4:42 am by Robin Effron
  The lawsuits are consumer class actions that seek damages for economic losses stemming from reduced value of cars subject to this problem.It looks like the lawsuits are being filed state by state with the expectation that they will then be consolidated as an MDL. [read post]
” While the judge granted leave for the plaintiff to re-file, the plaintiff would need to establish standing by alleging she suffered economic loss and that she would go back to Chipotle in order to have standing. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 4:30 am
The case was styled as an economic-loss-only class action. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 9:25 pm by John W. Arden
A claim for negligent misrepresentation requires a plaintiff to establish that the defendant made an incorrect statement, which was justifiably relied upon, causing economic loss. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 9:34 am by Joseph Sano
The theory of relief in the underlying complaint is that the plaintiffs would not have purchased the products had Avent made certain information known to the consumers and therefore the plaintiffs have been economically injured. [read post]
20 May 2015, 12:06 pm by Podhurst Orseck
“The loss to all these consumers is going to be huge,” Prieto said. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 5:38 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Likewise, a plaintiff must show proximate cause: “ordinarily … economic or reputational injury flowing directly from the deception wrought by the defendant’s advertising; and that occurs when deception of consumers causes them to withhold trade from the plaintiff. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 12:19 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Only in seven of the 22 states under whose laws plaintiffs sued had even arguably applied the economic loss doctrine in a stranger case, and almost all were lack-of-access or public nuisance cases, where almost anyone could in theory be a plaintiff. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 8:15 am
While Judge Selna determined that the plaintiffs adequately pled their cases that they suffered economic losses under the CLRA and UCL, he says that Coleman cannot bring his claims under those statutes because he bought his car in Texas. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 8:27 am by Earl Drott
During the discovery phase of the litigation, the defendants retained three experts to give an opinion on the amount of economic loss suffered by the plaintiff (presumably, loss of future earning capacity was an element of the damages for which he sought compensation from the defendants). [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 2:15 pm by Rebecca Coll
" “This economic harm—the loss of real dollars from a consumer’s pocket—is the same whether or not a court might objectively view the products as functionally equivalent. [read post]
The court dismissed several other claims, stating that under Pennsylvania’s economic loss doctrine, “no cause of action exists for negligence that results solely in economic damages unaccompanied by physical or property damage. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
She further alleges that she has a statutory right, under section 36 of the Competition Act, to recover loss and damages accordingly. [read post]