Search for: "CSEA v. Doe" Results 41 - 60 of 70
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Sep 2011, 3:29 am
The agreement, according to CSEA, “covers all unit members and does not distinguish between part-time and full-time employees with respect to health insurance benefits. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 9:17 am
” See Ford v CSEA, 94 AD2d 262, in which the court addresses the critical question of the power of an arbitrator to render a decision which impacts on or affects a public policy. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 4:43 am
” ** This option was set out in the initial collective bargaining agreement negotiated between the State as an employer and the Civil Service Employees Association with respect to employees in negotiating units represented by CSEA. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 4:43 am
” ** This option was set out in the initial collective bargaining agreement negotiated between the State as an employer and the Civil Service Employees Association with respect to employees in negotiating units represented by CSEA. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 3:59 am
Public policy does not nullify the choice she made (cf., Matter of Abramovich v Board of Educ., 46 NY2d 450, cert denied 444 US 845). [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:52 am
[v]Another element that may cause some misunderstanding of the priorities in a layoff -- the individual may have been appointed to what has been designated a “permanent position” or appointed to position designated a “temporary position. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 5:01 am
"Turning to the County’s argument that an arbitration award interpreting the CBA in such a way as to require post-expiration step increases would be violative of public policy, the Appellate Division said that "such a potential does not mandate a stay of arbitration. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 2:40 am
Determining if assigned duties constitute out-of-title workCSEA v Angello, App. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 5:51 am
Collective bargaining agreement requires village to reimburse its retirees participating in its health insurance plan their Medicare premiumsMillington v Village of S. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 3:48 am
Claim of mistake does not permit a party to rescind provisions set out in collective bargaining agreementPlattsburgh v Plattsburgh Police Officers Union, 250 AD2d 327, motion to appeal denied, 93 NY2d 807Disabled firefighters and disabled police officers are entitled to significantly different benefits under New York’s General Municipal Law, Sections 207-a (firefighters) and 207-c (police officers).If a police collective bargaining agreement dealing with disability benefits… [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 4:31 am
Stay of arbitrationTown of Hempstead v CSEA Local 1000, Supreme Court, Nassau County, [Not selected for publication in the Official Reports]Under what circumstances will a court issue an order barring a grievance from being submitted to arbitration? [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 3:57 am
Out-of-title work Article 78 petition dismissed for failure to exhaust remedy provided in the collective bargaining agreementCSEA v Groton Cent. [read post]
12 May 2010, 7:16 am
*Accordingly, although exceptions to the "notice of claim" requirement exist, it would seem prudent for an aggrieved party to file a timely notice of claim with a school district consistent with the provisions set out in §3813(1) rather than try to persuade a court that it was not necessary to do so in a particular situation at some later date.* In CSEA v Lakeland Central School District, 230 A.D.2d 703, the Appellate Division rejected the School District's… [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 5:10 am
-C.I.O. v Baldwin Union Free School Dist., 2010 NY Slip Op 20091, decided on February 3, 2010, Supreme Court, Nassau County, Justice Daniel Palmieri Francesco Pignataro filed an Article 78 petition seeking a court order allowing him to revoke his letter of resignation and settlement agreement he submitted to his former employer, the Baldwin Union Free School District.While two arbitrations involving grievances concerning his ability to perform the duties of his position were pending,… [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 2:26 am
Union’s right to demand and obtain documents on file with the employer in a grievance procedure does not extend to disciplinary actionsMatter of Pfau v Public Empl. [read post]