Search for: "California v. Burns" Results 41 - 60 of 770
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2012, 1:13 pm by WIMS
According to the Appeals Court, defendant CB&I Constructors, Inc., (CB&I) negligently caused a June 2002 wildfire that burned roughly 18,000 acres of the Angeles National Forest in Southern California. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 11:20 am
As is the California Supreme Court's unanimous affirmance. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 11:36 pm
For this reason, I'm not sure that I wouldn't take this case up if I was on the California Supreme Court. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 1:55 pm by WIMS
      The Appeals Court ruled in part, ". . . while South Coast correctly states that the gas quality of the North Baja gas 'would be up to a 1385 Wobbe Index,' this number does not take into account any blending or conditioning of gases that may occur in either the North Baja pipeline itself or the California pipeline system, nor does it reflect the WI of gas in the Basin at the time it is actually burned. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 8:28 am by Ralph L. Jacobson
California’s “primary assumption of the risk” doctrine was first set forth in Knight v. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 10:37 pm
A  Ninth Circuit panel split 2-1 on whether a California wholesale buyer of clean-burning CARB gasoline alleged a viable claim under section 1 of the Sherman Act. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 7:14 am by Grant H. Cokeley
The bill, similar to one that passed the Assembly last year before stalling in the State Senate, was likely inspired by the recent California Court of Appeals decision in Bolger v. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 11:30 am by Jon Sands
United States-Montes-Ruiz, No. 12-50398 (Rawlinson with Gould and Lemelle (EDLA)) ---  In Setser v. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 10:42 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Callaghan, September 22, 2016, Court of Appeal -Fourth Appellate District – State of California More Blog Entries: Alcala v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 8:00 am by Bruce Nye
 So here are CBL's pieces for February: The California Courts of Appeal keep banging their heads against the wall when it comes to arbitration, finding arbitration agreements unconscionable and refusing to enforce them no matter what the US Supreme Court said in AT & T Mobility v. [read post]