Search for: "California v. Cooks"
Results 41 - 60
of 647
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2019, 7:58 am
Day Three of the FTC v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 4:41 pm
Cooke, the Supreme Court decision. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 10:11 pm
Several Northern District of California judges have recently released orders in civil rights cases and petitions for habeas corpus, among them: In Bolbol v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 7:59 am
Holdings, Ltd. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 7:25 pm
Karlseng v. [read post]
26 May 2013, 8:39 am
Cook County, 2013 U.S. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 2:00 pm
(Knight v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 1:42 pm
Cooke, the January Supreme Court decision reminding the Ninth Circuit that "the responsibility for assuring that the constitutionally adequate procedures governing California's parole system are properly applied rests with California courts, and is no part of the Ninth Circuit's business. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 11:37 am
John Quinn files a declaration defending his personal reputation in the Apple v. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 11:35 am
According to the initial complaint, Martinez et al v. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 9:53 am
Borello & Sons, Inc v Dept. of Industrial Relations (1989) 48 Cal.3d 341. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 11:00 pm
Several Northern California Judges have recently ruled in prisoner and civil rights cases. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 1:43 am
On Friday, Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California granted Epic Games' motion for a preliminary injunction against Apple only with respect to its developer account for Unreal Engine, but it's still up to Epic itself to #FreeFortnite, though Epic's aggressive attitude makes a Ninth Circuit decision likely to be inevitable before the iOS version of Fortnite will return to the App Store.Late on Monday, Epic and… [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 9:02 am
Cook County Department of Corrections, 2016 Ill. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 12:18 pm
Cook Incorporated, of Bloomington, Indiana, had filed a patent infringement lawsuit in the Southern District of Indiana against Endologix, Inc., of Irvine, California. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 12:05 pm
Sweeney v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 8:05 am
The case is entitled Wiig v. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 9:53 am
Borello & Sons, Inc v Dept. of Industrial Relations (1989) 48 Cal.3d 341. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 4:00 am
In Behrend v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 10:53 am
He also said Tash had shown a lack of insight into his crime by maintaining that he shot in self-defense, and that Mosley had a record of disciplinary offenses in prison.Both men lost appeals in state court but had temporary successes in federal court.That is, until the Supreme Court's forceful reminder last week that federal courts do not enjoy the role of final gatekeeper for California parole-eligible inmates. [read post]
