Search for: "California v. Lord"
Results 41 - 60
of 304
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2015, 4:00 am
In Pellegrino v. [read post]
19 Nov 2020, 11:00 am
" This exceedingly rigorous, subtle, and well-researched book has major implications for understanding the interplay among law, society, culture, and politics not only in modern China but also in many places with similarly complicated experiences with modernity.An honorable mention went to Elizabeth Papp Kamali (Harvard Law School) for Felony and the Guilty Mind in Medieval England (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019).Members of this year's Stein Award committee were Li Chen… [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 9:30 pm
Mirow (Florida International University), Daniel Lord Smail (Harvard University), and David V. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:56 am
As Inforrm noted here, in a post examining the detail of the Amendments, there were 16 Lords Amendments. [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 5:08 pm
The House of Lords considered a private members bill, Anonymity (Arrested Persons) Bill proposed by Lord Paddick. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 5:50 am
Samuels v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 12:32 pm
Lord, if you are willing, please make that continue to be the case during the upcoming year as well. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 4:15 pm
He said out of the blue “Thank the good Lord for Mapp v. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 5:36 pm
Last month I blogged about Sedgwick Claims Management v. [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 5:08 pm
Schwartz, University of California, Berkeley – School of Law. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 10:22 am
California State Lands Commission (2012) 202 Cal.App.4th 549. [read post]
26 Oct 2019, 7:47 am
Huawei, after which I'll focus (until there's further news from the London case) on some other topics, such as a couple of filings in the Northern District of California (one of which, like Unwired Planet v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 11:46 pm
Lord, Senior Law Librarian, at the Asa V. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 3:07 am
The claimant’s intention was to enter into a surrogacy arrangement in California. [read post]
3 Sep 2007, 4:38 pm
Doe v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 2:27 pm
This past September, LVMH also secured a $32.4 million judgment in their favour against an ISP in California for contributory trade mark infringement in the selling of counterfeit products (see this AmeriKat post). [read post]
14 Oct 2018, 4:20 pm
He refused the representative claimant permission to serve the claim on Google in California. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 9:36 am
The biggest news of the week is that the Defamation Bill received Royal Assent and is now the Defamation Act 2013, three years after the publication of Lord Lester’s original Defamation Bill. [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 1:20 pm
Greb v. [read post]
19 Jul 2008, 11:22 am
" "Yes, Your Worship (or M'Lord). [read post]
