Search for: "California v. Rodriguez"
Results 41 - 60
of 437
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2018, 7:00 am
” And in Roberts v. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 10:30 pm
This opinion just goes to demonstrate how utterly absurd the California crime of "burglary" has become.There's no doubt that the defendant was guilty of a variety of crimes. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 5:00 am
The decision in Dahlia v. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 5:00 am
The decision in Dahlia v. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 5:00 am
The decision in Dahlia v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 4:54 pm
Last July, in an entry titled Incentive Awards Ok, but Not Incentive Agreements, I commented on the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals’ decision in Rodriguez v. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 10:30 am
For the past 30 years, this status has been part of the equation and most likely affected an innumerable number of would-be personal injury claims.A Brief History of the SituationThis entire situation goes back to 1986 when a California appellate court case known as Rodriguez v. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 11:36 pm
District Court for the Eastern District of California 2009). [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 11:19 am
But there are also a lot more things to think about today than whether the Ninth Circuit or the California Court of Appeal got X or Y right in a particular case. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 8:04 pm
Or maybe also because I know that, as a white guy, it wouldn't happen to me.But while stopped at a red light at an intersection in Hayward in September of 2003, Francisco Sanchez -- who had just paid his union dues and wasn't afilliated with a gang in any way -- was murdered in cold blood for no reason other than an idiot Norteno gang member concluded that Sanchez was a member of a rival Sureno gang because he was wearing a blue UNC baseball cap.The thought that you can be killed for… [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 9:36 am
The Ninth finds the government meets that standard, here).United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 7:14 am
Rodriguez v Instagram, LLC (California Superior Court of San Francisco Case CGC-13-532875) (February 28, 2014). [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 9:04 pm
As soon as I glanced at United States v. [read post]
A California Judge Allows a Baker to Discriminate Against a Lesbian Couple Who Wanted a Wedding Cake
7 Feb 2018, 7:00 am
” And in Roberts v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 8:11 am
” The court harkened back to the California case Edwards v. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 5:06 pm
In Rodriguez v. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 10:30 am
In Rodriguez v. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 12:55 pm
Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 1:45 pm
Supreme Court case Miranda v. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 7:39 am
Yesterday, Governor Brown acted on what was known as AB 2159 by signing it into law.See below with an update provided by Attorneys Halpern and Montevideo:On May 2nd & 3rd, Consumer Attorneys of California (CAOC), including its members from San Diego, was in Sacramento meeting with California Assembly Members and Senators to discuss, among many topics, a bill to stop a prevalent discriminatory civil litigation practice aimed at marginalizing plaintiffs based on their… [read post]
