Search for: "California v. Root"
Results 41 - 60
of 810
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Oct 2012, 3:58 am
Frequently a case like this comes up in the entertainment field, with its CA and NY roots. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 5:50 am
At Reason.com, Damon Root looks at the issues in United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2025, 10:35 pm
California he expressed misgivings about Hammon v. [read post]
15 May 2022, 3:21 pm
" It's by Neil Gong and Alex V. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 4:05 am
In Markel v. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 11:50 am
With the answer that I believe both the California Supreme Court would give and that the Ninth Circuit's looking for.Here goes:The statute provides that when someone violates the California Disabled Persons Act, the plaintiff is entitled to statutory damages of $1,000 "for each offense." [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 1:36 pm
(Lotus v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 9:08 am
” Whalen v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 12:49 pm
Fowler of the University of California San Diego Department of Political Science, have posted Six Degrees of Marbury v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 10:49 am
Borello & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 9:35 am
On November 9, 2009, the Third District issued an opinion in Louie v. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 12:36 pm
Sandoval and more recently in Morton v. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 3:02 am
Beal Bank, SSB v Arter & Hadden, LLP (42 Cal 4th 503, 167 P3d 666 [2007]), a case defendants cite, is distinguishable because it involves the interpretation of a California statute that codifies the continuous representation doctrine. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 5:28 am
Hewlett Packard Co. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 5:08 am
Today will be the closing arguments in the Federal challenge to California's Proposition 8. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 8:00 am
Supreme Court ruled in Miranda v. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 4:48 am
The People Round 4: Sedgwick v. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 12:08 pm
(See “California Supreme Court Rules That a ZIP Code is Personal Identification Information — Pineda v. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 8:11 pm
Fulle v. [read post]
