Search for: "California v. Ware"
Results 41 - 60
of 116
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Oct 2011, 10:44 am
Schwarzenegger (the federal trial on California’s same-sex marriage initiative, Proposition 8). [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 8:53 am
In 1937, in Waring v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 2:27 pm
This past September, LVMH also secured a $32.4 million judgment in their favour against an ISP in California for contributory trade mark infringement in the selling of counterfeit products (see this AmeriKat post). [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
SeeEisner v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 12:20 pm
Those issues arise in the case of Perry v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 3:30 pm
Meyerkord v. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 12:29 pm
In Ware v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 9:50 am
Facebook, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 11:11 am
Delman v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 6:41 pm
In New York v. [read post]
12 May 2011, 7:57 pm
District Judge James Ware of San Francisco, who took over the case of Perry v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 5:42 pm
The decision is in Rosen v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 8:10 am
On Monday, the proponents of the anti-gay marriage Proposition 8 in California argued that the district court’s decision declaring Prop 8 unconstitutional in Perry v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 6:38 pm
Kendrick, 244 F. 3d 572, 578–579 (CA7 2001); Entertainment Soft-ware Assn. v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 1:02 pm
The court cites to Lee v. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 1:29 am
[Post by Venkat, with additional comments by Eric] Facebook v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 6:35 pm
Nakamura v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 11:30 am
Citing Gordon v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:15 am
The court distinguished several other cases on the ground that they only involved a right to reproduce and sell records, even though some of them had cited a 1937 Pennsylvania case, Waring v. [read post]
12 Jun 2022, 3:42 pm
§6901, establishes a rebuttable presumption that any goods, wares, articles, and merchandise mined, produced, or manufactured wholly or in part in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region of the People’s Republic of China, where the U.S. government says China is committing genocide against the Uyghur people, or produced by an entity on a list required by clause (i), (ii), (iv) or (v) of section 2(d)(2)(B) are prohibited under section 307 of the Tariff Act of 1930 are not… [read post]
