Search for: "Call v. McKenzie"
Results 41 - 60
of 128
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2007, 10:21 am
Cascade Health Solutions v. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 11:55 am
In McKenzie v. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 6:00 am
Entitled “SAS: major software copyright ruling upheld”, Silverman provides an elegant summary of the Court of Appeal decision in SAS Institute Inc. v World Program Ltd [2013], here. [read post]
23 May 2014, 10:24 am
The increase in penalty means the maximum is higher in Canada than it is in the U.S. or U.K.In the trial decision in R. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 4:22 pm
Armes v Nottinghamshire County Council [2016] EWHC 2864. [read post]
9 Jul 2022, 10:00 am
McKenzie v. [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 7:22 am
In Hidy Motors v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 6:15 am
[v.] [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 11:39 am
See Sgalambo v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 12:36 pm
Thanks to a Barcelona Court reference, the CJEU has been called on to enter the debate -- which goes far beyond taxis and concern the much broader relation between traditional and sharing economy, explains Katfriend Revital Cohen (Baker & McKenzie, Barcelona).* Jumpin' through hoops? [read post]
8 Apr 2017, 4:33 pm
Appreciate you are busy but it would be v helpful to have answers to qs about party status and existence/format of jmt. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 4:14 pm
Appearances For the appellant: Bruce McClintock SC and Richard Potter instructed by Baker & McKenzie. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 4:22 am
Using funding from a Russian organisation called the Moscow Bureau for Human Rights, Mr Terluk found legal representation for his appeal. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 2:10 am
” Drizos v. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 4:00 am
In R v McKenzie, a 2015 case from the Ontario Superior Court, Campbell J crafted a procedure for determining whether the prosecution had edited too much information from an ITO. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 11:59 am
In McKenzie v. [read post]
7 Oct 2018, 4:08 pm
The ICO has fined a Manchester based firm £150,000 for making nuisance calls. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 11:40 am
Supreme Court will be hearing arguments in April, 2012 on this issue in another case, Christopher v. [read post]
26 Aug 2018, 2:05 pm
After serving a section 21 notice which turned out to be defective, the Gills sought the services of a set up called “Remove a Tenant” (RaT), a trading name of Fentham Group Limited. [read post]
1 Apr 2017, 4:48 pm
He actually said : Regular ill-informed and deliberately partial press commentary must have an impact on the public at large but targeted so-called advice by some semi-professional McKenzie Friends or other lay organisations to vulnerable individuals who find themselves the subject of care proceedings, has the effect in some cases of moving those individuals directly away from engaging effectively in the court process and achieving access to the system, which I believe would… [read post]
