Search for: "Canada v. Client Services Inc."
Results 41 - 60
of 320
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2019, 1:56 pm
Un d’eux, TekSavvy Solutions Inc. [read post]
15 Sep 2019, 4:00 am
Intitulé : 6362222 Canada inc. c. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 4:16 am
Last year an interlocutory injunction was issued by the Federal Court to enjoin the marketing and sale of ISDs in Bell Canada v. 1326030 Ontario Inc. [read post]
8 Apr 2017, 3:20 am
The decision in this regard is consistent with the recent holding in the Bell Canada v. 1326030 Ontario Inc. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 3:11 pm
Following General Motors of Canada v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 6:22 pm
Covenoho was hired pursuant to a 1 year fixed term contract to perform services for one of Pendylum’s clients, Ceridian Canada Ltd. [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 4:00 am
CONTRAT DE SERVICES : Bell Mobilité inc., condamnée en première instance au remboursement de près d’un million de dollars à des clients qui ont payé des frais de résiliation pour avoir mis fin à leur contrat à durée déterminée avant terme, n’obtient pas le rejet de l’action collective intentée contre elle. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 10:03 am
Google * Equustek Solutions Inc. v. [read post]
29 May 2017, 4:00 am
If there were such a civil service advisor, benchers could then justify giving priority to their own sources of income, i.e., to their clients and employers. [read post]
28 Oct 2021, 7:31 am
The legal test for whether an injunction is appropriate comes from the Supreme Court of Canada’s 1994 decision in RJR-MacDonald Inc. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2019, 8:47 pm
The extent to which the Consumer Protection Act applies to non-consumers in the context of class proceedings was recently examined by the Supreme Court of Canada in TELUS Communications Inc. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 6:00 am
Some of our employer readers (and clients) may recall scrambling to update their employment contracts following the 2020 release of Waksdale v. [read post]
11 Mar 2007, 4:45 pm
Justice Frank Newbould of the Ontario Court of Justice in Trapeze Software Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
Ucar Carbon Canada Inc., [1998] O.J. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 9:23 am
The Tribunal issued its reference decision, Kobo Inc. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 4:00 am
In short, unbundled legal services means clients pay for some assistance depending on: (1) what they want help with and (2) what they can afford. [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 8:27 am
For more information about our competition and advertising law services see: competition law services. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 6:26 am
Black v. [read post]