Search for: "Capital One Bank v. Miller" Results 41 - 60 of 98
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm by MOTP
What if one holds that the contract was procured by barratry and is void, and the other one reaches the opposite conclusion? [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 2:56 pm by John Elwood
Both this week’s winners of golden tickets are one-time relists: Hawkins v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 6:15 am by John Elwood
That case involved the retroactivity of the Supreme Court’s decision in Miller v. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 7:08 am by John Elwood
Louisiana, 14-6381, which had two relists after the record arrived and five total, involves the retroactivity of Miller v. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 2:00 pm by John Elwood
Louisiana, 14-6381 (second relist since the record arrived, fifth overall), concerns the retroactivity of Miller v. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 12:58 pm by John Elwood
Caulkett 13-1421, and Bank of America v. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 5:42 am by John Elwood
Louisiana, 14-6381, (second relist) concerns the retroactivity of Miller v. [read post]
24 May 2013, 9:00 am by P. Andrew Torrez
 Now, Nathan has sued the developer's holding company, Harbinger Capital Partners, and others alleging that he was wrongfully forced out. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 2:54 am by Peter Mahler
Scholastic Inc. v Harris, 259 F3d 73, 85-86 [2d Cir 2001]; Johnson v Kennedy, 350 Mass 294, 298, 214 NE2d 276, 278 [1966]; Posner v Miller, 356 Mich 6, 9, 96 NW2d 110, 111-112 [1959]; Nicholes v Hunt, 273 Or 255, 261-262, 541 P2d 820, 823-824 [1975]; Willman v Beheler, 499 SW2d 770, 775 [Mo 1973]; Fisher v Fisher, 83 Cal App 2d 357, 360, 188 P2d 802, 804 [1948]). [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 2:36 am by Kevin LaCroix
  Background The underlying claim (referred to as the “Miller action”) involves a lawsuit brought by five individuals against Strategic Capital Bancorp, Inc. [read post]