Search for: "Caps v. Board Members"
Results 41 - 60
of 341
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2024, 6:57 am
A board member is pushing to install a heater. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 1:40 pm
* Copyright in the Animal KingdomInternkat looks back on Heythrop v CAPS. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 9:03 pm
Noel Canning v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 5:00 am
CFPB Survives Another Attack Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 7:21 am
Board of Regents of Univ. of Okla., 468 U. [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 2:53 pm
(European Commission v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:19 pm
This in particular since “the public retains only an imperfect memory of the marks registered in the Member States or of Community marks ... [read post]
Precedential No. 31: TTAB Dismisses U. Alabama Opposition to HOUNDSTOOTH MAFIA & Design for Clothing
29 Jul 2013, 2:51 am
Bryant, Jr. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2021, 7:53 pm
Key takeaways The Singapore High Court recently confirmed in Mah Kiat Seng v Attorney-General [2021] SGHC 202 (Mah Kiat Seng) that the common law doctrine of public interest immunity remains part of Singapore law and was not superseded by the enactment of the Evidence Act (Cap. 97) (EA) in 1893. [read post]
14 May 2015, 3:19 pm
The Doe v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 11:10 am
“It is simply an internal human relations scheme imposed on RCMP members by management. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 11:51 pm
CFM Buckley/North, LLC v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 6:46 pm
In Brandenburg v. [read post]
6 May 2014, 4:52 am
Here’s news from Richards Layton (we’ll be posting memos in our “Poison Pills” Practice Area – and here’s a DealBook article on Sotheby’s truce): In Third Point LLC v. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 2:20 am
* Disciplinary authority over the EPO Boards of Appeal: a former member speaksThe EPO saga has been extensively covered by Merpel, who gave the floor to the protests of almost the entirety of the internal members, and many (here and here) of the external members of the Enlarged Board of Appeal against the so-called "house ban" imposed on a member of the Board of Appeal, which were also… [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 2:01 pm
Other Board members are Republicans John F. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 3:16 pm
The Court of Appeals affirmed, holding that, in adopting the Portion Cap Rule, the Board of Health exceeded its regulatory authority and engaged in law-making, thereby infringing upon legislative jurisdiction.Read More: Top state court says NYC can’t ban businesses from selling supersize sugary drinks to customersMcCullen v. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 12:56 pm
Two recent decisions dealing with mandatory retirement policies reveal that the issue is still relevant despite amendments to human rights legislation in most (if not all) provinces to remove the "cap" of 65 years from the definition of "age".The first case is Esprey v. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 5:53 am
Bell and Province of Alberta v. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 5:53 am
Bell and Province of Alberta v. [read post]
