Search for: "Car Care Center V, LLC"
Results 41 - 60
of 76
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2014, 7:03 am
The employer’s motion for summary judgment was denied in part and granted in part (Norman v Bright Horizons Family Solutions, LLC, January 23, 2014, Kovachevich, E). [read post]
20 Oct 2013, 8:45 pm
O'Kelley has finally had enough and issued an order telling the parties to stop filing motions, that he would hold a hearing on sanctions based on the motions to date in due course, and generally saying STOP THAT RACKET OR I'LL PULL THIS CAR RIGHT OVER SEE IF I DON'T. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 2:58 am
By V. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 11:13 am
Top Employer Questions on Employee Social Media Conduct Answered By: Kaiser Wahab and Lauren Mack Employers are now on full alert that employee’s online activity in the office and in the home has a direct, often beneficial / often detrimental impact, on the bottom line. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
City of Indianola, et al.Court: U.S. 8th Circuit Court of Appeals Docket: 10-3815 Opinion Date: August 16, 2011 Judge: Melloy Areas of Law: Constitutional Law, Government & Administrative Law, Real Estate & Property Law The City of Indianola (City) adopted a land-use ordinance requiring the enclosure of "figure eight cars," among other racing vehicles, when two or more such cars were present. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 10:00 am
In Meineke Car Care Centers, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 11:13 pm
Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. [read post]
23 May 2011, 6:00 am
In the recent case of Meineke Car Care Centers, Inc v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 1:10 am
Sergeant’s Pet Care Products, Inc., et. al. [read post]
2 May 2011, 4:49 pm
By using the shops’ actual past performance to calculate projected future royalties and advertising fund contributions, the analysis was not the sort North Carolina courts rejected as being too remote.The decision is Meineke Car Care Centers, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 4:52 pm
Franchisors seeking such damages should find joy in Meineke Car Care Centers, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 11:11 am
Bartlesville Care Center (10th Cir. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 4:19 pm
See Till v. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 11:03 am
General Motors Co. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 5:10 pm
New Jersey and Ring v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:43 am
But his administration’s decision on this case, Connecticut v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 9:24 am
Click Here DECISIONS Arkema, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 1:04 pm
Blum and Bay Center Apartments Owner LLC v. [read post]
31 Jul 2010, 3:12 am
The car accident caused the losses, not his running away. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
– United States Environmental Protection Agency, July 20, 2010 Subject to court approval, Cardi Materials, LLC of Warwick, R.I., will pay a $55,000 civil penalty and perform an additional project costing $168,500 to resolve numerous violations of the Clean Water Act at its Warwick concrete manufacturing facility. [read post]
