Search for: "Card+ v. US" Results 41 - 60 of 6,703
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Oct 2008, 7:08 am by Thomas Swartz
  And unfortunately, many cards have dormancy fees which decreased the value of the cards if they are not used within a certain time. [read post]
Supreme Court recently decided Expressions Hair Design v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 7:55 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website] ruled [opinion, PDF] unanimously Monday in Chase Bank v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 7:15 am by aschwartz
 This argument relied on cases such as Kaiser Foundation v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 10:50 am by Brandon W. Barnett
The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals considered this issue recently in the case of Clinton v. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 5:18 am by Susan Brenner
The court then noted that [Ramey] purchased the note cards for her own use. [read post]