Search for: "Care Capital Properties, Inc." Results 41 - 60 of 401
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2018, 9:37 am by Tiffany Blofield
DJ Kahled and his son’s company sued an online retailer named Curtis Bordenave and his company, Business Moves Consulting, Inc., alleging that they are illegally using he and his son Asahd’s intellectual property. [read post]
Landowners who are not eligible for the deduction must capitalize the expenses (add them to the basis of the property). [read post]
Landowners who are not eligible for the deduction must capitalize the expenses (add them to the basis of the property). [read post]
Landowners who are not eligible for the deduction must capitalize the expenses (add them to the basis of the property). [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 1:48 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKIntellectual Property Fact Issues Exist in 'Sippy Cup' Maker's Infringement, Dilution Lawsuit Luv N' Care Ltd. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2019, 8:20 am by Staff Attorney
 The company claims to have a $2.4 billion portfolio of 633 properties as of the June 2019. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 9:45 pm by Law Lady
Health Care Reform: VIRGINIA FEDERAL JUDGE DERAILS PART OF HEALTH CARE REFORM LAW, Commonwealth v. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 10:59 am
In this case, Wells Fargo Bank NA filed a stay relief motion as Trustee for Morgan Stanley Capital I, Inc. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 4:29 am by Marie Louise
Calypso Capital Management, LP (TTABlog) District Court E D Pennsylvania: Legal effect of consent to use and register name of a living individual when the name is already a trademark: Warren v. [read post]
1 May 2009, 11:00 am
You don’t need an NDA (Intellectual Property Directions) Is everything obvious? [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
(IPKat) German Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) guidance regarding registrability of 'spa' in relation to beauty care products and spa services (Class 46)   Europe ARMAFOAM: the ECJ rules on linguistic and changes OHIM's rules on conversion: Armacell v OHIM (CATCH US IF YOU CAN !!!) [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 5:00 am by John Jascob
Still, as in the Uber case, where the company has an exculpatory charter provision regarding allegations of due care violations, the plaintiff may invoke an escape valve by alleging the board’s bad faith. [read post]