Search for: "Caremark, Incorporated"
Results 41 - 60
of 75
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Dec 2019, 6:10 am
Securities and Exchange Commission, on Thursday, December 19, 2019 Tags: Accounting, Accounting standards, Accredited investors, Disclosure, Dodd-Frank Act, PCAOB, Regulation D, SEC, Securities regulation, Swaps On Inference When Using State Corporate Laws for Identification Posted by Holger Spamann (Harvard Law School), on Thursday, December 19, 2019 Tags: Acquisitions, Antitakeover, Delaware… [read post]
27 Aug 2019, 7:17 am
The landmark decision In re Caremark International Inc. [read post]
27 Aug 2019, 7:17 am
The landmark decision In re Caremark International Inc. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 6:09 am
Larcker (Stanford University), and Eva Zlotnicka (ValueAct Capital), on Tuesday, June 4, 2019 Tags: Boards of Directors, Corporate Social Responsibility, ESG, Institutional Investors, Long-Term value, Risk management, Stakeholders, Sustainability Why CalPERS and Colorado PERA Moved to Intervene in the Johnson & Johnson Mandatory Arbitration Case Posted by Matthew Jacobs (CalPERS), Adam Franklin (Colorado PERA) and Megan Peitzmeier (Colorado PERA),… [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 7:40 am
CVS Caremark Corp., 748 F.3d 249, 262-63 (5th Cir. 2014); Petrofac, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2018, 6:15 am
Schwartz, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, on Monday, September 24, 2018 Tags: Board composition, Boards of Directors, California, Charter & bylaws, Diversity, Incorporations, Jurisdiction, SB 826, Securities regulation, State law My Beef with Stakeholders: Remarks at the 17th Annual SEC Conference, Center for Corporate Reporting and Governance Posted by Hester M. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 2:04 pm
CVS Caremark Corp. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 6:09 am
CVS Caremark Corp., 748 F.3d 249, 262–63 (5th Cir. 2014) (citing Petrofac, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 8:43 am
The court describes this as the “essence of a Caremark claim. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 9:00 pm
According to the court, the allegations (of the complaint and the documents incorporated therein) would allow reasonable minds to argue either side of a debate over whether the directors’ oversight of the bank’s compliance program was sufficiently robust or flawed. [read post]
13 Aug 2016, 2:28 pm
Aug. 1, 2016), Vice Chancellor Montgomery-Reeves dismissed Caremark claims brought against certain directors (“Directors”) of Qualcomm, Incorporated (“Qualcomm” or “Company”). [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 8:49 am
See In re Caremark International Inc. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 4:04 am
The Court then equated a lack of this type of good faith with a director’s utter failure to attend to his or her oversight obligations (the so-called Caremark I duties). [read post]
12 May 2015, 3:26 pm
., Inc. 90261J137 UBS Yield Optimization Notes with Contingent Protection linked to Apple, Inc. 90261J145 UBS Yield Optimization Notes with Contingent Protection linked to Adobe Systems, Inc. 902619824 UBS Yield Optimization Notes with Contingent Protection linked to Schlumberger, Ltd. 902619832 UBS Yield Optimization Notes with Contingent Protection linked to Corning Incorporated 902619840 UBS Yield Optimization Notes with Contingent Protection linked to Cisco Systems, Inc. 902619857 UBS… [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 12:49 pm
First, even though the plaintiffs had stated a viable Caremark claim against the directors, because of the business judgment rule and the exculpatory provisions in Massey's certificate of incorporation, in order to obtain a monetary judgment against the directors, they would have to prove that the directors acted with scienter — a difficult standard to meet, particularly with independent directors. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 4:29 pm
The investigation is based on a February 25, 2011 complaint and March 11 and 15, 2011 letters supplementing the complaint filed by Femina Pharma Incorporated of Miami, Florida alleging violation of Section 337 in the importation into the U.S. and sale of certain vaginal ring birth control devices that infringe U.S. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 6:58 pm
On February 25, 2011, Femina Pharma Incorporated of Miami, Florida (“Femina”) filed a complaint requesting that the ITC commence an investigation pursuant to Section 337. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 7:37 am
., "The proxy specifically states that Caremark's directors will be indemnified not only "to the same extent such individuals are indemnified pursuant to Caremark's certificate of incorporation and bylaws" but also "to the fullest extent permitted by law . . . . [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 1:44 pm
Many of the statements at issue are from filings that are incorporated by reference. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 7:49 am
., which is headquartered in Colorado but incorporated in Indiana, won permission to exclude a declassification proposal filed by the California Public Employees' Retirement System by pointing to a new Indiana law that mandates classified boards unless a company opted out by July 31, 2009. [read post]
