Search for: "Carlin v. Carlin" Results 41 - 60 of 244
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Aug 2012, 8:18 am
You likely already know about the highly publicized manipulation of LIBOR. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 11:28 pm by Daithí
 I suppose for some, it’s our version of George Carlin’s Seven Dirty Words (although give me Carlin any day). [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 9:51 am by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
The current controversy goes back to a Supreme Court case called FCC v Pacifica, in which the FCC issued a warning to a radio station after it aired a monologue by the comedian George Carlin, which included the repeated use of seven "forbidden" expletives. [read post]
12 Jul 2009, 2:10 am
Balkinization readers might be interested in the following proposed footnote for the discussion of FCC v. [read post]
6 May 2008, 7:18 pm
5-7-2008 Nevada:A federal appeals court Monday threw out the conviction of a 36-year-old Carlin man found guilty of raping a 9-year-old girl in 1994, saying DNA testimony from a Washoe County Crime Laboratory scientist was "misleading" and "unreliable. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 1:35 pm by Norman Carlin and Eric Moorman
By Norman Carlin and Eric Moorman On November 21, the California Fifth District Court of Appeal issued its decision in Association of Irritated Residents v. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 6:34 am by Lawrence Solum
Here is the abstract: This chapter provides a back story to FCC v. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 6:16 am
Bank, University of California, Los Angeles, on Thursday, August 18, 2016 Tags: Boards of Directors, Compensation guidelines, Compensation ratios, Corporate culture, Executive Compensation,Labor markets, Management, Taxation Political Contributions and Lobbying Proposals Posted by Yafit Cohn, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, on Thursday, August 18, 2016 Tags: Accountability, Citizens United v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 11:05 am by Terry Hart
The outcome in both cases is extremely significant and provides us with insights into how last year’s Supreme Court decision in Andy Warhol Foundation v. [read post]