Search for: "Carolina v. Connecticut" Results 41 - 60 of 462
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Aug 2015, 6:46 am by Shea Denning
Yesterday, the Connecticut Supreme Court held in a 4-3 decision in State v. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 3:01 am by Walter Olson
Fenves over University of Texas policies] Tags: colleges and universities, diversity oaths, Joe Biden, law schools, North Carolina, Title IX [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 7:13 am by Ian Mance
See also Ex parte Bailey, 166 S.E. 165, 167 (N.C. 1932) (interpreting predecessor statute), rev’d on other grounds, South Carolina v. [read post]
13 Jan 2018, 8:00 pm
(See, e.g., Germain, 756 F.3d at pp. 941-954 [construing the laws of Arkansas, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, Nebraska, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Texas, Washington, and West Virginia]; Phelps v. [read post]
3 Sep 2018, 7:15 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 148188 (WD NC, Aug. 30, 2018), a North Carolina federal district court allowed a Rastafarian inmate to move ahead with claims of confiscation of religious books and items, and forced removal from a vegan diet.In Helm v. [read post]
11 Aug 2012, 12:22 am
Ready Pac said the products containing the apples were shipped to Alabama, Arkansas, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Iowa, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Vermont, Virginia, Wisconsin and West Virginia. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 164821 (ED NC, Sept. 26, 2018), a North Carolina federal district court dismissed a complaint by a Wiccan inmate that group worship was not provided because of too few adherents to satisfy the minimum requirement for providing it.In Jenkins v. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 4:41 am by Amy Howe
” At AntitrustConnect Blog, Steven Cernak looks at the “immediate aftermath” of the Court’s decision in North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]