Search for: "Carrier Corp. v. United Technologies Corp"
Results 41 - 60
of 71
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2020, 7:08 pm
Subchapter V – Return to Work Reporting Requirement Employers have a method to report if an employee refuses to return to work Plain language about returning to work Subchapter VI – Other Related Provisions and Technical Corrections Pay an extra $100 per week to individuals who have at least $5,000 a year in self-employment income, but are disqualified from receiving Pandemic Unemployment Assistance because they are not eligible for regular state unemployment benefits. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 6:26 am
Corp. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 5:01 am
Strategically located within major maritime navigation routes, the islands allow China to project military power further throughout the region in the manner of the so-called unsinkable aircraft carriers of the World War II Pacific theater. [read post]
9 May 2008, 10:30 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Order to transfer myspace.co.uk to MySpace overturned: (Out-Law), (IMPACT), New branding scheme for Ethiopian coffees: (Afro-IP), (IP finance), (IPKat), USPTO to appeal Tafas/GSK v Dudas: (Patent Docs), (Patently-O), (PLI), (Patent Baristas), (Managing Intellectual Property), (IP Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Ladas & Parry),… [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 5:15 am
Boston Scientific Corp., 433 F.3d 1, 5 (1st Cir. 2006)(holding that SOX has no application to employees outside the United States). [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 9:26 am
, General Electric Capital Corp. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 2:18 pm
Templo Fuente De Vida Corp. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:01 am
Common carriers are not the censors of public or private morals. [read post]
19 May 2010, 4:36 pm
Circuit’s recent decision in Comcast v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am
Click Here United Parcel Service to Pay $53,931 Civil Penalty to Settle Alleged Violations of Waste Regulations at Lenexa, Kan. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 4:14 am
Supreme Court’s 1974 decision in American Pipe & Construction Co. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 8:47 am
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 7:08 am
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 3:45 am
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
18 Oct 2006, 5:26 pm
The Regional Director found that TAPS is merely a common carrier pipeline, moving oil from one point to another. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 6:00 am
Research such topics as scope of application of IHL, detention, conduct of hostilities, cyber/new technology and weapons, migration, and other related topics. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 8:12 pm
(collectively, “Apple”) and the Respondents are High Tech Computer Corp., HTC America Inc., and Exedia, Inc. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 4:14 am
As discussed here, in Public Employees’ Retirement System of Mississippi, v. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 6:12 am
It Don't Mean A Thing If It Ain't Got That Swing On 06/28/10, the Supreme Court of the United States decided Bilski v. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 11:56 am
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
