Search for: "Caruso v. Caruso"
Results 41 - 60
of 165
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2019, 4:31 am
The purpose of the continuous representation doctrine is to avoid forcing a client to jeopardize the relationship with the attorney handling his or her case during the period that the attorney continues to represent them (Waggoner v Caruso, 68 AD3d 1, 7 [1st Dept 2009], af(d, 14 NY3d 874 [2010]). [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 4:29 am
Further, a legal malpractice claim cannot be stated if there is no attorney-client relationship between the parties (Waggoner v Caruso, 68 AD3d 1, 3 [1st Dept 2009], affd 14 NY3d 874 [2010]). [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 7:48 am
In Caruso v. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 8:00 am
This study found more nuances in the effectiveness of various types of training programs, with those based on the abilities-based MSCEIT model formulated by Mayer, Salovey and Caruso showing the most effectiveness. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 5:20 am
...at Aeon. [read post]
8 Sep 2018, 8:02 am
Bobby Chesney and Steve Vladeck dissected the Supreme Court’s landmark 1952 decision in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 4:12 am
The record presents an issue of fact as to whether defendant continuously represented plaintiff in connection with a personal injury claim based on the accident, such as to toll the statute of limitations during that time (see Glamm v Allen, 57 NY2d 87, 94 [1982]; Waggoner v Caruso, 68 AD3d 1, 6-7 [1st Dept 2009]). [read post]
3 Mar 2018, 10:17 am
” Phil Caruso described the rise of Chinese human intelligence campaigns in the U.S. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 4:15 am
The Amended Complaint alleges that Todtman Nachamie represented plaintiffs from August 2004 until April 2005, whereupon RFS represented plaintiffs from April 20058 until April 2012. 9 Plaintiffs rely on two cases which apply the continuous representation doctrine to toll the statute of limitations as to a prior law firm’s representation when attorneys from a prior firm left and moved to another firm (HNH Intl., Ltd. v Pryor Cashman Sherman & Flynn, 63 AD3d 534 [l st Dept… [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 11:24 am
Courthouse News says "Underscoring the bizarre nature of the proceedings, no attorneys for Equustek Solutions or the Canadian court system showed up, allowing Caruso to state her case to U.S. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 3:02 am
[Naomi Schaefer Riley, Acculturated, quotes me] “The Libertarian Lawyer Who Battled Jim Crow” [Damon Root on Moorfield Storey and Buchanan v. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 9:30 pm
Tessili v. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 9:08 am
Kasikci’s Bentley Management opens 2017 with new directions, clients and projects 编写：金百德律师及环球酒店专业律师团队 翻译：邓威律师 昨天，我在SoHo… [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 9:08 am
Kasikci’s Bentley Management opens 2017 with new directions, clients and projects 编写：金百德律师及环球酒店专业律师团队 翻译：邓威律师 昨天，我在SoHo… [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 7:31 am
Big ups to Michael Caruso, Janice Bergman, and Brenda Bryn for leading this fight. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 2:54 am
"Compare Lucien Piccard Watch Corp. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 5:30 am
District Court Decisions Brinklys & Caruso v. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 5:30 am
District Court Decisions Brinklys & Caruso v. [read post]
24 May 2016, 7:56 pm
Our book can be seen against this background, as its authors intervene in important, sensitive regulatory areas and policy discourses, ranging from debt and credit regulation (Michos, Somma, Renner & Leidinger), corporate liability and banking regulation (Engert, Tröger, Conley & Williams, Catá Backer), contractualization of corporate regulation and banking (Zumbansen, Varellas), contract governance itself (Lomfeld, Haberl, Caruso) to national and transnational economic… [read post]
