Search for: "Case v. Hatch"
Results 41 - 60
of 932
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
Part 1 of this piece can be found here. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 10:08 am
In FTC v. [read post]
24 Dec 2019, 5:14 am
On January 14, 2020, the Supreme Court will hear argument in Kelly v. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 6:07 pm
Reporter Kendall Hatch has a piece in The Metrowest Daily News considering the long-term implications of the Supreme Judicial Court's recent ruling in the open meeting law case, District Attorney for the Northern District v. [read post]
18 Nov 2024, 6:52 am
Inc. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2024, 6:52 am
Inc. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2024, 6:52 am
Inc. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 5:49 pm
Hatch-Waxman junkies will surely be watching this case closely. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 6:22 pm
Bartlett, a case testing whether the federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (and in particular the Hatch-Waxman Act) preempts a state design-defect claim against a generic drug... [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 4:59 am
Hatch v. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 1:48 pm
There's a California Supreme Court case called People v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 8:47 am
” The second reason the Court should hear the case is to ensure the viability of the important antitrust case of Verizon v. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 6:55 am
Mensing (09-993) and Actavis Elizabeth, LLC v. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 2:29 pm
Akorn, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 8:26 am
Case citation: Bock & Hatch LLC v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 10:55 pm
The Secretary of State may revoke a deportation order if she considers that deportation would breach a person’s rights under the European Convention of Human Right (pursuant to section 32(6) and section 33(2)(a) of the Act) The leading case in relation to deportation before the UK Border Act 2007 came into force in August 2008 was N (Kenya) v SSHD [2004] EWCA Civ 1094. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 8:28 am
Apotex loses.This is not a bad case to review to obtain background on the Hatch-Waxman Act.The case was about the drug respiridone:Janssen holds an approved NDA for its drug Risperdal ® Oral Solution. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 8:35 am
Extreme negligence can indeed stand in the shoes of bad intent for criminal law purposes, as it did in a case I was involved with many years ago, US v. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 2:46 pm
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 8:46 am
In the recent case (Hatch v. [read post]