Search for: "Cathcart v. Cathcart"
Results 41 - 60
of 126
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2018, 4:45 pm
The top ten new posts of the last quarter were as follows (in descending order) Top 10 Defamation Cases of 2017, a selection – Suneet Sharma The Guardian’s Leveson Betrayal, Line by Line – Brian Cathcart Media and Law: Overview of Defamation, Privacy and other Media Cases in 2017 [updated] Case Preview: Various Claimants v News Group Newspapers, Trial of phone hacking cases to begin on 18 January 2018 Data Protection: Overview of the Case Law in 2017 Case… [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 1:53 pm
Cathcart, 227 N.C. [read post]
18 Mar 2018, 5:08 pm
In a recent INFORRM post Brian Cathcart criticises the Guardian’s recent support of the Government in its decision not to implement Part 2 of the Leveson Inquiry. [read post]
11 Mar 2018, 5:30 pm
Brian Cathcart continues his analysis of Max Molsey’s ongoing media fallout in an article focusing on his discourse with the Daily Mail. 5RB has released two Podcasts on Interim Injunctions, featuring Alex Marzec and Adam Speker. [read post]
25 Feb 2018, 4:49 pm
Inforrm had a piece by Brian Cathcart dealing with evidence of Sir Alan Moses of IPSO. [read post]
14 Jan 2018, 4:32 pm
The Press Gazette considers Prime Minister Theresa May’s comments on the vote, which Brain Cathcart comments on in an Inforrm post. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 2:35 am
– Brian Cathcart Defamation Act 2013: The public interest defence and digital communications – Jacob Rowbottom Case Law: Dawson-Damer v Taylor Wessing, Subject access requests: Court of Appeal bolsters right to disclosure of data – Ashley Hurst and Peter Barratt Seamus Milne and the ‘Mystery Blonde’: Five years after Leveson the press still ignores privacy – Hugh Tomlinson QC How Dacre and the Mail are making the case for section 40 – Brian… [read post]
10 Dec 2017, 4:18 pm
Brian Cathcart has an alternative take in a piece entitled “IPSO’s Badge of Dishonour: Some Alternatives”. [read post]
15 Oct 2017, 4:05 pm
There were also press releases from Impress and Hacked Off about the decision and Brian Cathcart had a post about the case. [read post]
30 Sep 2017, 7:15 am
– Brian Cathcart Privacy and the end of innocence: An alternative perspective on Khuja (formerly PNM) v Times Newspapers – Robert Craig Using data protection law to defend your reputation: what about the new Data Protection Bill? [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 4:03 pm
There was no sign of the long anticipated judgment in Lachaux v Independent Print (although the judgment in Mionis v. [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 4:17 pm
The top ten posts of the term were as follows (in descending order) Case Preview: Jack Monroe v Katie Hopkins, Twitter libel trial about meaning and serious harm Case Report: Jack Monroe v Katie Hopkins, Libel Trial, Day 3: Claimants closing submissions, judgment reserved Defamation Act 2013: A Summary and Overview – Iain Wilson and Max Campbell How to avoid defamation – Steven Price How Dacre and the Mail are making the case for section 40 – Brian… [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 4:09 pm
” We had a post about it written by Brian Cathcart. [read post]
8 Jan 2017, 4:05 pm
Michael Geist has examined the case of Google v. [read post]
30 Oct 2016, 5:05 pm
” We published a post by Brian Cathcart about Roy Greenslade’s claims in the Guardian that the implantation of section 40 would mean that “press freedom was in danger. [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 4:07 pm
In a letter in the same paper Brian Cathcart pointed out that the responsibility of News UK for Mahmood’s activities had not been addressed. [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 4:32 pm
Brian Cathcart filleted Fraser Nelson’s self-congratulatory piece about the story in the Telegraph. [read post]
1 Oct 2016, 4:53 pm
We had posts about this by John Jewell and Brian Cathcart. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 2:05 am
As Brian Cathcart commented on Inforrm, the complaint appears to be a waste of time. [read post]
