Search for: "Cert Officers Wright"
Results 41 - 49
of 49
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2008, 8:39 am
A2732
Townsend (MS) -- Grants sworn police officers licenses to carry and possess firearms immediately upon retirement Same as S 7639 BLURB : Pen L. retired police lic weapon Last Act: 06/12/08 held for consideration in codesA11294
O'Mara -- Relates to waivers of jury trials No Same as BLURB : CP L. waivers of jury trials Last Act: 06/12/08 held for consideration in codes
Last Action Date: 06/16/08(Results Count = ) Bill No. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 2:19 pm
The response explained the late filing of the answer by stating that, on the day the answer was due, Respondents' counsel was delayed in returning to his office from a hearing. [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 2:26 pm
The Board similarly concluded that the Respondent failed to meet its Wright Line rebuttal burden with regard to the shift leader. [read post]
18 May 2007, 3:45 pm
In Planned Building Services, which issued after the judge's decision, the Board held that Wright Line, 251 NLRB 1083 (1980), enfd. 662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981), cert. denied 455 U.S. 989 (1982), provides the appropriate framework for deciding whether a successor employer violated Section 8(a)(3) by refusing to hire employees of its predecessor to avoid a bargaining obligation. [read post]
29 Apr 2007, 2:00 pm
I was retained to do his cert petition which was unsuccessful and then the House moved to impeach him. [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 9:42 am
Wright, 2005 PA Super 35, 867 A.2d 1265, 1267 (Pa. [read post]
29 Nov 2006, 2:13 pm
Yesterday, several members of the New York office of Akin Gump, led by Andrew Rossman, along with Carter Philips of Sidley Austin, filed this cert. petition in New York State Board of Elections v. [read post]
14 Aug 2006, 11:06 am
The majority agreed with the hearing officer that Grant was on disability leave and was neither affirmatively discharged nor had resigned at the time of the election and was therefore eligible to vote under Red Arrow Freight Lines, 278 NLRB 965 (1986). [read post]
4 Aug 2006, 4:25 pm
In determining whether the Respondent's failure to refer Taylor as a hook-on employee was unlawful, the Board applied the analytical framework set forth in Wright Line, 251 NLRB 1083 (1980), enfd. 662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981), cert denied 455 U.S. 989 (1982), and found that the Respondent met its rebuttal burden of establishing that it would not have referred Taylor to work with Mansfield as a hook-on employee even in the absence of his protected activity. [read post]
