Search for: "Certification of Question of Law to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review"
Results 41 - 60
of 108
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2017, 11:03 am
Baxter Military Prize Certificates of Merit. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 10:50 am
All works submitted will be considered for publication in The Air Force Law Review. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 9:51 am
Editor’s Note: This is part two in a multi-part series on foreign intelligence surveillance reform. [read post]
2 Sep 2018, 11:31 am
The Irish High Court and eventually, on appeal, the ECJ are likely to address the adequacy of underlying U.S. surveillance and privacy law—the same law that applies to data transferred under Privacy Shield. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 7:48 am
The legislation can be broken down into four broad categories: 1) substantive reforms to the laws the NSA believes allow it to conduct its surveillance programs, 2) disclosure of the FISA Court opinions that determined the programs were legal, 3) general reporting of the number and types of surveillance orders received by recipients and how many users affected, and 4) reforms to the FISA Court. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 7:11 am
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces and current Chair of the American Bar Association Standing Committee on Law and National Security. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 4:30 pm
The “Wall” In this section, Gonzales and Mueller detailed the implementation history of FISA, which requires “certification from a high-ranking Executive Branch official that ‘the purpose’ of the surveillance or search was to gather foreign intelligence information. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 2:58 am
The main reason for the difference between the two judgments is that the Swedish surveillance regime did provide for initial authorisation of bulk warrants by an independent Foreign Intelligence Court. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 5:51 am
On November 16, members of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI), identified as “the Majority FISA Working Group” of that committee, released a report on Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA). [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 4:21 pm
” The ACLU also has endorsed the bill, in rather strong terms: To put this in historical context: If the Senate passes the bill, it will be the first time since passage of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act in 1978 that the chamber has taken action to constrain the intelligence community, and the first time Congress has a real shot at restoring the crucial privacy protections lost in the Patriot Act. [read post]
14 May 2015, 8:51 pm
The realistic question, then, is whether the Senate can and will can pass this bill. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 6:29 pm
We expect that the FISA court’s review of these targeting procedures in the course of the court’s periodic review of Section 702 certifications will include an assessment of whether the revised procedures provide adequate guidance to ensure that targeting decisions are reasonably designed to acquire foreign intelligence information relevant to the subject of one of the certifications approved by… [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 10:28 am
Since the verdict, the defendant has sought to undo his conviction, questioning both the government’s compliance with provisions of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), and those provisions’ very legality. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 1:19 pm
In particular, should the inspector general’s report be understood as repudiating, or merely pretermitting, claims of political bias in the Crossfire Hurricane investigations and the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) applications targeting Carter Page? [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 9:10 am
A certificate as Certified Public Accountant or a Certified Internal Auditor, obtained through written examination; or c. [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 8:12 am
A certificate as Certified Public Accountant or a Certified Internal Auditor, obtained through written examination; or c. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 12:34 pm
” to discuss Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996, its expansive interpretation by the courts, and whether improvements to the law should be made. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 9:59 am
Please direct any questions to privacy@law.georgetown.edu. [read post]
10 May 2018, 3:33 pm
Here is John’s guest post. ************************** This week the first contested ICO/SEC oral argument finally took place at the historic Brooklyn New York Federal Courthouse in a hearing before famed 70+ year old Judge Raymond Dearie (who also happens to sit on the United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC, also called the FISA Court, and the subject of some congressional and presidential discussion,… [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 1:39 pm
” Doshi will be interviewed by O’Hanlon and answer questions from the audience. [read post]
