Search for: "Chambers v. Department of Correction"
Results 41 - 60
of 356
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2011, 12:54 pm
This note is wholly based on another note of the case from Hardwicke Chambers. [read post]
17 May 2011, 12:54 pm
This note is wholly based on another note of the case from Hardwicke Chambers. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 3:22 pm
Taking into consideration the cases of A v United Kingdom (3455/05) (2009) 49 EHRR 29 ECHR (Grand Chamber) and Secretary of State for the Home Department v F (2009) UKHL 28, (2009) 3 WLR 74, the claimants’ arguments on this point were upheld. [read post]
4 Jan 2009, 3:24 pm
NOTE: This post has been corrected to show that the hearing is Wednesday, not Tuesday. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 9:26 am
In Muller v. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
The test is set out in RJR — MacDonald Inc. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 8:42 am
Three decisions of the Administrative Appeals Chamber of the Upper Tribunal on HB matters stand out: SS v North East Lincolnshire Council (HB) [2011] UKUT 300 (AAC); MB v Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea (HB) [2011] UKUT 321 (AAC); MR v Bournemouth Borough Council (HB) [2011] UKUT 284 (AAC). [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 8:42 am
Three decisions of the Administrative Appeals Chamber of the Upper Tribunal on HB matters stand out: SS v North East Lincolnshire Council (HB) [2011] UKUT 300 (AAC); MB v Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea (HB) [2011] UKUT 321 (AAC); MR v Bournemouth Borough Council (HB) [2011] UKUT 284 (AAC). [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 8:06 am
Department of Labor, by a group of 21 states, and the other, Chamber of Commerce of Plano v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:00 am
CHAMBERS LARA J. [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:00 am
CHAMBERS LARA J. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 12:53 pm
Petitioner, who is an inmate at the Bare Hill Correctional Facility, purported to challenge his continued incarceration in the custody of the New York State Department of Correctional Services. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 2:42 pm
Petitioner, who is an inmate at the Bare Hill Correctional Facility, purported to challenge his continued incarceration in the custody of the New York State Department of Correctional Services. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 11:15 am
So you don’t miss it, there appear to be at least 3 clear mistakes in the court’s opinion: Twitter as ICS provider 230’s application to the SCA breach of contract being both covered and not covered by 230 I’m not sure what’s going on in this judge’s chambers, but this is a suboptimal situation that will likely need correction. * * * I get increasingly nervous when I see new rulings involving Twitter because, at any point, we will start see… [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 7:16 am
I bring you two important cases from the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) about sub-let fees and administration charges:Holding & Management (Solitaire Ltd) v Norton and other appeals [2012] UKUT 1 and Re: Bradmoss Ltd [2012] UKUT 3 (LC). [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 7:16 am
I bring you two important cases from the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) about sub-let fees and administration charges:Holding & Management (Solitaire Ltd) v Norton and other appeals [2012] UKUT 1 and Re: Bradmoss Ltd [2012] UKUT 3 (LC). [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 9:35 am
Virginia Department of Corrections, 2013 U.S. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 1:34 am
Lord Toulson then turned to a second line of argument, first developed by the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in King v American Airlines. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 3:54 am
” For the ABA Journal, Mark Walsh previews Department of Commerce v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 6:00 am
R (Kiarie) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; R (Byndloss) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 15-16 February 2017. [read post]
