Search for: "Champagne v. Champagne"
Results 41 - 60
of 305
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2008, 2:15 am
App. 2007), and Owens v. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 10:29 am
Supreme Court case, Wyeth v. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 4:10 am
Champagne, 2014 U.S. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 11:20 am
In Champagne v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:26 am
In Bohnak v. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 9:11 pm
*Baze v. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 9:04 pm
I have yet to see evidence that this hairstyle has infected the legal profession but a bottle of champagne to the first solicitor, barrister or costs draftsman who can produce a picture of themselves about to enter court displaying such a haircut. [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 10:05 pm
Powered by a wonderful champagne just a few minutes ago, here are the short version of mine: At LEAST 10% of the AmLaw 100 law firms will fold by the end of 2009 - the era of the megafirm is over. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 4:23 pm
The Court appears to have applied the standard used in its 1969 Rumer v Evans holding: “‘[d]iscriminations of an unusual character especially require careful consideration. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 4:23 pm
The Court appears to have applied the standard used in its 1969 Rumer v Evans holding: “‘[d]iscriminations of an unusual character especially require careful consideration. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 1:55 pm
“What do you call an Aussie with a bottle of champagne at The Ashes? [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 7:51 am
Gasque v. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 5:00 am
“I can’t help preferring champagne to ditch water — I doubt if the universe does. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 12:18 am
Still according to Publishers Weekly, the appeal could be complicated by the fact that the Second Circuit is already preparing to rule on a parallel case, the Authors Guild v HathiTrust [on which see here and here]. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 9:30 pm
DonovanRethinking People v. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 3:17 pm
The case is Marin Asenov v. [read post]
17 May 2016, 10:11 am
Of course no IP gathering nowadays is complete without a discussion of the Unified Patent Court, and Pierre Véron (Véron & Associés) and Rowan Freeland (Simmons & Simmons) will be tackling this. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 2:51 pm
At the rate things are going in the case of State v. [read post]
10 Nov 2006, 7:42 am
A particularly relevant case is Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. [read post]
