Search for: "Champagne v. Champagne"
Results 41 - 60
of 305
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2020, 2:24 pm
From Bellino v. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 1:41 am
However, the opposition in the case of Comite Interprofessionnel du Vin de Champagne v. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 7:00 am
The next case, Moore v. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 12:31 pm
Blumenthal Distributing, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 7:00 am
State DA 19-0226 2020 MT 163 Civil – Postconviction Champagne v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 11:51 am
See Grisworld v. [read post]
22 Feb 2020, 9:11 am
Doe v. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 3:42 pm
Attorney General; HCJ 11298/03 Movement for Quality Government in Israel v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 9:41 am
In his reference, the Judge trotted through the English court's and CJEU's case law Article 3(a) - Takeda, Farmitalia, Daiichi, Yeda, Medeva (and its progeny), Actavis v Sanofi, Eli Lilly v HGS, Actavis v Boehringer, - and found that it was clear that something more was required, but what that "something" was was not clear. [read post]
1 Dec 2019, 7:52 pm
Licensing Corp. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 6:43 am
The art works at issue often feature naked or scantily-dressed women holding Dom Pérignon champagne bottles and, in some instances, mere outlines of such bottles and their iconic label. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 1:34 am
Early Bird Standard = £510 Early Bird Group Ticket / IBIL Sponsor / UCL alumni = £433.50 Standard fee = £600 Standard Group Ticket / IBIL Sponsor / UCL alumni = £510 More information: here Fashion Law Seminar: Common Law v. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 5:00 am
“I can’t help preferring champagne to ditch water — I doubt if the universe does. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:10 am
He also discussed his imaginary girlfriend, Champagne. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 2:51 am
Nonetheless, the Board found the connotations and commercial impressions of the marks to be "quite dissimilar" because of the presence of the word CREEK in applicant's mark.The circumstances of this case are very similar, if not identical, to those in Champagne Louis Roederer S.A. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 3:17 am
" Citing Royal Crown Co., Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 11:43 pm
See United States v. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
This is in keeping with the central purpose of federal campaign finance law, as the US Supreme Court put it in Buckley v. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 10:48 am
See Hill v. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 10:46 am
Related Cases: Lexmark v. [read post]
