Search for: "Chancellor v. State"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,356
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2014, 7:28 am
In United States Civil Service Commission v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 5:00 am
Syst. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 2:21 am
High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Lord Chancellor v McCarthy [2012] EWHC 2325 (QB) (06 August 2012) High Court (Administrative Court) Reilly & Anor, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (Rev 1) [2012] EWHC 2292 (Admin) (06 August 2012) Source: www.bailii.org [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 7:15 pm
Lebanon County Employees’ Retirement Fund v. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 4:44 am
The Secretary of State maintained that the Supreme Court decisions in R (Unison) v. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 10:13 am
Patel, R (on the application of) v Lord Chancellor [2010] EWHC 2220 (Admin) (27 August 2010) – Read judgment The wife of the purported ringleader of the ’7/7? [read post]
17 Jul 2007, 5:15 am
Let us start with an examination of his analysis in greater detail.We examined Ryan v. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 5:00 am
In a recent opinion issued by Vice Chancellor Parsons, Carlyle Investment Management, L.L.C., et al. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 8:19 am
The Supreme Court was careful to note that it is not possible to state a general rule as to whether or not an Order made by Her Majesty in Council is amenable to judicial review in the courts of England and Wales, given the wide variety of circumstances in which such Orders are made. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 4:00 pm
In Price v. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 12:15 am
Last week, the Vice Chancellor denied the application Palkon v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 11:11 am
From last week's Mississippi Supreme Court decision in State v. [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 12:06 am
This brief paper examines whether the United States violated any rules of public international law when tapping the Chancellor's cell phone. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 9:00 am
In other words, counsel in both states appear to have been of the same mind. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 12:15 am
Vice Chancellor J. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
"Noting that Supreme Court had directed DOE, in an order issued in May 2013, to follow its own stated procedure by accepting the rescission letter and reinstating Respondent, subject to the Chancellor's approval as provided in the regulation, the Appellate Division held that DOE's delay "was unacceptably long and effectively operated to subvert the court's order. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
"Noting that Supreme Court had directed DOE, in an order issued in May 2013, to follow its own stated procedure by accepting the rescission letter and reinstating Respondent, subject to the Chancellor's approval as provided in the regulation, the Appellate Division held that DOE's delay "was unacceptably long and effectively operated to subvert the court's order. [read post]
25 Oct 2007, 1:30 pm
In Benton v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:44 am
I have a few thoughts about Chancellor Chandler's opinion in eBay v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 2:56 pm
Partnership v. [read post]
