Search for: "Child v. Child"
Results 41 - 60
of 28,503
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2019, 6:00 am
An Ontario court grappled with this interesting question in Makdissi v. [read post]
4 Jul 2013, 2:00 am
Carroll v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 6:32 am
In Brough v Law [2011] EWCA Civ 1183, decided today, the Court of Appeal considered the effect of the parents' reconciliation upon a child maintenance assessment, with reference to the provisions of the Child Support Act 1991 as operative in 1999.The Facts: The parents were married, and had a son, born in 1996. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 8:23 am
The North Carolina Court of Appeals considered State v. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 7:09 am
In a recent Ontario Court of Justice motion decision, Juneau v. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 12:05 pm
See M.H.B. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 8:28 pm
The Age of the Child: Interrogating Juveniles After Roper v. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 8:26 am
Huff – Paramours Complicate Indiana Child Custody Cases, June 17, 2016, Hammond Child Custody Lawyer Blog The post Wallerstedt v. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 8:26 am
Huff – Paramours Complicate Indiana Child Custody Cases, June 17, 2016, Hammond Child Custody Lawyer Blog The post Wallerstedt v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 2:22 pm
See Filippone v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 6:11 am
A few hours later I came across the report of CMEC v Mitchell on Bailii.The case involves the ever-ingenious David Burrows, who sought to claim that the Act applied to applications by CMEC under s.39A Child Support Act 1991 for the issue of a warrant committing the liable person to prison or for an order for him to be disqualified from holding or obtaining a driving licence. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 5:17 am
Handerson v. [read post]
30 May 2015, 7:29 am
Additional Resources:Bogner v. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 7:33 am
A finding of Unfounded means there is not a preponderance of evidence that a child has been abused or neglected and the evidence indicates the child was not harmed or placed at risk of harm. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 10:13 am
A United States Supreme Court decision, Kulko v. [read post]
11 Apr 2009, 7:58 pm
Van Dusen v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 10:49 am
(For your reference, the case name is Vaccari v. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 7:39 am
In State v. [read post]
8 Dec 2018, 2:00 am
" State v. [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 2:12 am
I count myself as being truly tardy in not reporting on Grant v. [read post]