Search for: "Christian v. ALL PERSONS CLAIMING ANY RIGHT"
Results 41 - 60
of 666
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2018, 1:30 pm
Colorado Civil Rights Commission, and Trump v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 12:38 pm
He has done more, personally, than any Justice with whom he has sat to buttress the sovereignty — and the dignity — of state governments. [read post]
16 May 2012, 5:46 am
The less serious the defamatory meanings that survive, the stronger will be the case for dismissing some or all of the remaining claims under Jameel abuse of process principles (see below). [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 9:00 pm
On June 15, 2020, advocates of LGBTQ rights won a 6-3 Supreme Court victory in Bostock v. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 6:30 am
We all can get along. [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 5:30 am
Your interpretation of Christianity and Judaism here would give you the right to donate and fund charity without governmental interference, and that is all. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 3:47 am
’ The classification of all non-Muslims as unbelievers (kuffar). [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 7:19 am
In a case that drew much attention over an evangelical Christian’s claim that he could not use an employer’s newly implemented biometric hand scanner because it carried the “mark of the beast,” the Fourth Circuit held the evidence at trial supported the jury verdict in the employee’s favor on his Title VII religious accommodation claim. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 8:27 am
Apart from those exceptions, “any business of any size could bring any free exercise claims. [read post]
9 Feb 2019, 2:34 pm
Kagan is absolutely right about all of this. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 6:40 am
Argued he had First Amendment right. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 11:14 pm
Likewise, Braunfeld v. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 2:45 pm
And the Supreme Court majority simply ignored the substance of the policy and any claimed justifications for it. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 7:24 am
As in Bible Believers v. [read post]
4 May 2007, 6:05 pm
Section 61(1)(b) of the Act provides that no person shall refuse to supply a product to or otherwise discriminate against any other person engaged in business in Canada because of the low pricing policy of that other person. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 5:28 am
And, pertinent here, it would remove from the scope of the CFAA any hacking conspiracy with an inside person. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
He of course never believed any of Christianity’s central claims; his parents were raising him Jewish. [read post]
5 May 2016, 1:00 am
The CJEU set out to answer this question in March this year.The case of Christian Liffers v Producciones Mandarina SL and Mediaset España Comunicación SA dealt with Christian Liffers' movie "Dos patrias, Cuba y la noche" (Two Homelands: Cuba and the Night), which he directed, wrote and produced, discussing six intimate stories about homosexual or transsexual individuals living in Cuba. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 4:29 am
The high court is scheduled to consider whether to take up the case, Dupuy v. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 12:04 pm
This is essentially the issue that the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) had to address in Sekmadienis v Lithuania (Appl No 69317/14). [read post]
