Search for: "Christian v. Attorney General of the United States" Results 41 - 60 of 375
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2013, 9:01 am by Rachel Sachs
Perry and United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 6:29 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
At The Volokh Conspiracy, Dale Carpenter discusses the amicus brief he filed in United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 6:42 am by Joshua Matz
Today, the Court will hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 1:01 pm by Amy Howe
The exclusion stems from an opinion by the state’s attorney general indicating that the state should carve out sectarian options to avoid violating the Constitution’s establishment clause, they observe. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 1:08 pm by Alfred Brophy
Gertz was deemed a private figure, despite having written books, being active in the community, and being a well-respected and recognized local attorney. [read post]
27 May 2017, 1:56 pm by Josh Blackman
Reading the Fourth Circuit’s en banc opinion in International Refugee Assistance Project v. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 4:02 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Washington Blade, Chris Johnson reports that the florist “[c]ontend[s] the state attorney general had clear anti-religion bias in pursuing the case against her. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 11:30 am by Amy Howe
(argued April 16, 2018): U.S. laws generally apply only to conduct that happens in the United States. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 10:38 am by Matt Sundquist
Martinez (2010); Seth Waxman and Ted Olson in Citizens United v. [read post]
Whistleblower Protection In what appeared to be a first under the DTSA, the Eastern District of Pennsylvania federal court  in Christian v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 4:26 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks how fully a judge must explain a sentencing modification. [read post]
26 May 2017, 10:42 am by Quinta Jurecic
Attorney General Jeff Sessions has promised to appeal the case, International Refugee Assistance Project v. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 4:24 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the justices held that a defendant who pleads guilty in a plea deal can generally benefit from later changes in the sentencing guidelines, “marks another episode in the continuing saga about how to treat the Federal Sentencing Guidelines,” and that “[b]y failing to explain what ‘advisory’ Guidelines actually are, and by making inconsistent statements about the role of the Guidelines at sentencing, the Court has left… [read post]