Search for: "Christopher J. Richard"
Results 41 - 60
of 656
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Feb 2023, 12:49 am
74-80 Çaliskan, Yusuf; Çaliskan, Zeynep “2 Temmuz 2019 Tarihli Yabanci Mahkeme Kararlarinin Taninmasi ve Tenfizine Iliskin Lahey Anlasmasinin Degerlendirilmesi”, Public and Private International Law Bulletin 40 (2020), pp 231-245 (available here) (An Evaluation of 2 July 2019 Hague Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters) Cardoso, Connor J. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 8:07 am
Christopher Wagner, C.A. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:44 am
Putting aside the idiosyncratic chapter by the late Professor Berger, most of the third edition of the Reference Manual presented guidance on many important issues. [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 10:34 am
Christopher J. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 3:31 pm
Margaret Kwoka, Against Government’s Reification of Business Secrecy, JOTWELL (December 1, 2022) (reviewing Christopher J. [read post]
14 Dec 2022, 11:59 pm
’ In an interview, Georg Rauh and Richard Ebbink of Vossius and Brinkhof UPC Litigators told this blog they expect a concentration of patent litigation firms. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 12:22 pm
J. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 7:19 am
, 44 Harvard J. of Law & Pub. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 5:01 am
” As Center for a New American Security CEO Richard Fontaine said in a recent episode of the Lawfare Podcast, the word “strategy” in the NSS is something of a misnomer—anyone looking for an articulation of objectives and how to achieve them may be disappointed. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 5:54 pm
There is a post on the Doughty Street Chambers website concerning the settlement of the Millett v Corbyn libel action, entitled Richard Millett Discontinues Libel Action Against Jeremy Corbyn MP. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 12:15 pm
Richard W. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:04 pm
In “Cheng’s Proposed Consensus Rule for Expert Witnesses,”[1] I discussed a recent law review article by Professor Edward K. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 11:51 pm
74-80 Çaliskan, Yusuf; Çaliskan, Zeynep “2 Temmuz 2019 Tarihli Yabanci Mahkeme Kararlarinin Taninmasi ve Tenfizine Iliskin Lahey Anlasmasinin Degerlendirilmesi”, Public and Private International Law Bulletin 40 (2020), pp 231-245 (available here) (An Evaluation of 2 July 2019 Hague Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters) Cardoso, Connor J. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 4:59 am
District Judge Raymond J. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 2:55 pm
Richard W. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 2:52 pm
J. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 7:46 am
74-80 Çaliskan, Yusuf; Çaliskan, Zeynep “2 Temmuz 2019 Tarihli Yabanci Mahkeme Kararlarinin Taninmasi ve Tenfizine Iliskin Lahey Anlasmasinin Degerlendirilmesi”, Public and Private International Law Bulletin 40 (2020), pp 231-245 (available here) (An Evaluation of 2 July 2019 Hague Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters) Cardoso, Connor J. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 8:25 am
Senn, Kenneth J. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 12:11 pm
On 26 July 2022, there were hearings in Dyson v MGN Limited before Nicklin J and Smith -v- Baker and another before Griffiths J. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 2:00 am
” (p. 224) As Richard John notes in his contribution to this symposium, “That the administrative state emergence in this period, rather than before 1866, as a large and growing chorus of revisionist historians have implied, or after 1932, as an older generation of New Deal-centric scholars assumed, is Novak’s main historiographical contribution. [read post]
