Search for: "Christopher v. SmithKline Beecham Corp."
Results 41 - 60
of 96
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2011, 8:09 am
SmithKline Beecham Corp., that a proposed class of pharmaceutical sales representatives (“Sales Reps”) were exempt from overtime pay pursuant to the “outside sales exemption. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 7:16 am
Smithkline Beecham Corp. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 6:51 am
Bloomberg’s Greg Stohr also provides coverage of the grant in Christopher v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 7:21 am
Smithkline Beecham Corp. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 10:03 am
SmithKline Beecham Corp. – eligibility of “outside salesmen” of pharmaceutical companies for overtime pay Tues., April 17: 11-5683 — Dorsey v. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 12:25 pm
In a case of first impression within this circuit, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in Christopher v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 2:03 pm
Smithkline Beecham Corp., dba Glaxosmithkline. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 6:00 am
SmithKline Beecham Corp., that held a proposed class of pharmaceutical sales representatives to be exempt from overtime pay pursuant to the “outside sales exemption. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 8:51 am
SmithKline Beecham Corp. is the Supreme Court's resolution of the conflict. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 10:34 am
SmithKline Beecham Corp., where it held that GlaxoSmithKline's PSRs were properly classified as exempt. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 8:57 am
SmithKline Beecham Corp. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 7:50 am
SmithKline Beecham Corp. here. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 12:54 pm
SmithKline Beecham Corp., 9th Cir. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 5:44 pm
SmithKline Beecham Corp., No. 11-204, 567 U.S. --- (June 18, 2012) and FCC v. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 11:40 am
SmithKline Beecham Corp. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 8:03 am
SmithKline Beecham Corp. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 7:30 am
SmithKline Beecham Corp. in which the Court will consider whether the Fair Labor Standards Act’s “outside sales exemption” applies to pharmaceutical sales representatives. [read post]
11 May 2016, 1:16 pm
SmithKline Beecham Corp. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 5:47 am
SILVERMAN ON JUNE 21, 2012 In Christopher, et al. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 7:08 am
The Court’s holding in Christopher v. [read post]