Search for: "Citizens for Responsibility a v. FEC" Results 41 - 60 of 190
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2013, 6:58 am by Alex Vitrak
The extraordinary revelation this week that the Internal Revenue Service targeted tea party groups for more aggressive enforcement highlights exactly why caution is needed in any response to the much-vilified Supreme Court decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 12:03 am by Peter Kinder
Still, nowhere is it written that when the shells come out, the mark can’t take a hammer to them.Footnotes1 Citizens United v. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 7:44 am by Ronald Collins
FEC dissent Justice Stephen Breyer cited to specific pages in your book, even before it came out in print. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 9:50 am by Thomas B. Griffith
Circuit’s recent decision in Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 5:15 am by Matt Sundquist
” Elsewhere, commentators analyze how Citizens United v. [read post]
While PACs have been around since the 1940s, they have proliferated since the US Supreme Court released Citizens United v. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 8:15 am by Richard Pildes
Several months ago I wrote to argue against the constantly-repeated storyline that cast Citizens United as responsible for the explosion of SuperPacs in this election cycle. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 11:22 am
  The order was issued in the case of Citizens United v. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 6:59 am by Adam Chandler
Last Thursday's ruling in Citizens United v. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 7:59 pm by Allan Blutstein
 2013)Citizens for Responsibility & Ethics in Wash. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 6:00 am
Elections Posted by Michael Sozan, Center for American Progress, on Friday, December 6, 2019 Tags: Accountability, Citizens United v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 7:19 am by Jay Willis
Commentators continue to weigh in on last Thursday's decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 1:18 pm
In a response filed Aug. 3, however, Citizens United contended that there would be no value in adding another lawyer to the Sept. 9 hearing. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 12:04 pm
  To make that possible, they urged the Court to seek a response from the FEC by Feb. 1. [read post]