Search for: "City of Atlantic City v. County of Atlantic" Results 41 - 60 of 217
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 May 2007, 8:13 am
Parma City School Distr., No. 05-983 (opinion here; oral argument transcript here); Bell Atlantic v. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 5:15 am by Edith Roberts
” At The Atlantic, Garrett Epps examines Buck v. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
City of Miami and Wells Fargo & Co. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 4:00 am
While my story above was hypothetical, the 6th District Court of Appeals in Lucas County held in Ramsdell v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 12:38 pm by Steve Hall
Supreme Court's ruling in Maples v. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 10:09 am by admin
Jurors in Atlantic City made the award today to punish J&J, the world’s largest seller of health-care products. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 8:09 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Atlantic City that the reasoning in cases like Catletti survives the reasoning in Garcetti. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 1:09 am by John Steele
From Legal Malpractice Law Review: more on Black v. [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 1:04 pm
Glendening, 709 A.2d 1230 (Md. 1988) and City and County of San Francisco v. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 8:43 am by Brett Raffish
Monroe County, the Supreme Court held that Alabama sheriff-defendants represented the state as a whole, not their individual counties, when executing their law enforcement duties. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 1:54 am
  In DISMISSING the appeal, the Appellate Term, Second Department, stated: Here, defendant sought a protective order and the court denied its motion, affording plaintiff the full relief sought in opposition (see Atlantic Hudson Realty v Rhodes, 271 AD2d 558 [2000]). [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 12:27 pm
Hoffmann-La Roche Inc., ATL-l-7481-10-MT, New Jersey Superior Court, Atlantic County (Atlantic City). [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 8:51 am by admin
Gynecare Inc., Atl-L-6966-10, filed in the Superior Court of Atlantic County, New Jersey (Atlantic City) involves the first lawsuit to go to trial over whether Johnson & Johnson’s (“J & J”) Ethicon unit properly designed a vaginal mesh implant and adequately warned of its risks. [read post]