Search for: "City of Los Angeles v. Public Utilities Commission"
Results 41 - 60
of 97
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2019, 7:24 am
Instead, I consulted press accounts, Justice Department press statements, research papers, university publications, teen magazines, business publications, the Federal Trade Commission, women’s legal defense advocacy pages, U.S. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:44 pm
Kelo v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 7:41 pm
California State Lands Commission (2018) 24 Cal.App.5th 476. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 11:57 pm
The Commission approved t [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 9:28 pm
Sierra Club v. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 10:30 pm
City of Los Angeles (2018) 19 Cal.App.5th 465. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:28 pm
City of Los Angeles, 191 Cal.App.3d 259 (1987), these provisions did not confer the ability to mitigate environmental impacts in a meaningful way. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
City of Los Angeles, 191 Cal.App.3d 259 (1987), these provisions did not confer the ability to mitigate environmental impacts in a meaningful way. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
City of Los Angeles, 191 Cal.App.3d 259 (1987), these provisions did not confer the ability to mitigate environmental impacts in a meaningful way. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 9:17 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently denied rail opponents’ petition for review of the STB’s decision (Kings City v. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 9:17 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently denied rail opponents’ petition for review of the STB’s decision (Kings City v. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 10:07 am
In addition, 15 localities—Austin, Baltimore, Buffalo, Chicago, Columbia (MO), the District of Columbia, Los Angeles, Montgomery County (MD), New York City, Philadelphia, Portland (OR), Prince George’s County (MD), Rochester, San Francisco, and Seattle—have also extended their state’s “Ban the Box” laws to private employers. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 10:07 am
In addition, 15 localities—Austin, Baltimore, Buffalo, Chicago, Columbia (MO), the District of Columbia, Los Angeles, Montgomery County (MD), New York City, Philadelphia, Portland (OR), Prince George’s County (MD), Rochester, San Francisco, and Seattle—have also extended their state’s “Ban the Box” laws to private employers. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 10:27 am
In addition, 15 localities—Austin, Baltimore, Buffalo, Chicago, Columbia (MO), the District of Columbia, Los Angeles, Montgomery County (MD), New York City, Philadelphia, Portland (OR), Prince George’s County (MD), Rochester, San Francisco, and Seattle—have also extended their state’s “Ban the Box” laws to private employers. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 4:04 pm
City of Los Angeles, 191 Cal.App.3d 259 (1987), these provisions did not confer the ability to mitigate environmental impacts in a meaningful way. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 12:17 pm
City of Los Angeles (2004) 126 Cal.App.4th 1180, 1197-1198.) [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 12:00 pm
Los Angeles County, March 26, 2015). [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:52 am
City of Los Angeles (2007) 153 Cal.App.4th 1385)? [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 10:45 am
Franklin California Tax-Free Trust, 15-255, both one-time relists asking whether Chapter 9 of the Bankruptcy Code “preempts a Puerto Rico statute creating a mechanism for the Commonwealth’s public utilities to restructure their debts”; CRST Van Expedited, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 9:48 am
City of Los Angeles (2007) 153 Cal.App.4th 1385)? [read post]
