Search for: "City of New York v Martinez" Results 41 - 60 of 167
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Dec 2012, 4:11 am
Interpreting any statute, first and foremost, requires paying heed to the intent of the Legislature as reflected in the plain language of the statute Samuelsen, as president of Local 100, Transport Workers Union of Greater New York v New York City Tr. [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 5:51 pm
As we pointed out in our prior article, Nahman never mentioned the 4th Department's ruling from last spring in Martinez v. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 2:28 pm
  The 4th Department, which decided the Martinez case, is among the most conservative of the four appellate departments and produced a unanimous decision by judges elected in Western and Central New York, not in New York City. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 4:39 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The plaintiffs alleged that by letter [*2]dated September 18, 2015, the New York State Department of Transportation proposed to terminate the status of Mid City as a disadvantaged business enterprise (hereinafter DBE). [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 7:34 am by James Romoser
City of Philadelphia (Leslie Griffin, Verdict) On Fulton v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 3:37 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Co. of N.Y., 98 NY2d 314, 326; see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d at 88; Russo v Macchia-Schiavo, 72 AD3d 786; Martin v New York Hosp. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 7:47 pm by Kimberly Harding - Guest
  The Volokh Conspiracy had two reviews of the decision while the New York Times and Ben Smith and, separately, Josh Gerstein and Abby Phillip from Politico discuss the effects of the decision in general, Jillian Scharr of NBC New York discusses the possible effects of the decision on New York City, and Josh Blackman looks at the future of the Privileges or Immunities Clause. [read post]
24 Nov 2021, 10:22 am
In moving for leave to enter a default judgment, the plaintiff must "state a viable cause of action" (Fappiano v City of New York, 5 AD3d 627, 628 [2d Dept 2004]). [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 2:58 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The only New York appellate court decision on point is that of the First Department in Wilson v City of New York (294 AD2d 290), which held that recovery of nonpecuniary damages is not permitted. [read post]
22 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In considering a motion pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7) to dismiss a complaint for failure to state a cause of action, the court must afford the pleading a liberal construction, accept the facts as alleged in the pleading as true, accord the plaintiff the benefit of every possible favorable inference, and determine only whether the facts as alleged fit within any cognizable legal theory (see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87; Bumpus v New York… [read post]
22 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In considering a motion pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7) to dismiss a complaint for failure to state a cause of action, the court must afford the pleading a liberal construction, accept the facts as alleged in the pleading as true, accord the plaintiff the benefit of every possible favorable inference, and determine only whether the facts as alleged fit within any cognizable legal theory (see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87; Bumpus v New York… [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal Cassidy Hutchinson’s Testimony Highlights Legal Risks for Trump Yahoo News – Alan Feuer and Glenn Thrush (New York Times) | Published: 6/29/2022 The extent to which the Justice Department’s expanding criminal inquiry into the insurrection at the U.S. [read post]