Search for: "City of Santa Clara, Cal., in Re" Results 41 - 47 of 47
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2021 CEQA 3rd QUARTER REVIEW
13 Oct 2021, 5:44 am by Abbott & Kindermann, William W. Abbott, Diane G. Kindermann, Glen C. Hansen and Daniel S. Cucchi
City of Berkeley (2021) 63 Cal.App.5th 277. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
2020 CEQA 4th QUARTER REVIEW
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am by Abbott & Kindermann, William W. Abbott, Diane G. Kindermann, Glen C. Hansen and Daniel S. Cucchi
County of Stanislaus (2020) 10 Cal.5th 479. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
2020 CEQA 4th QUARTER REVIEW
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am by Abbott & Kindermann, William W. Abbott, Diane G. Kindermann, Glen C. Hansen and Daniel S. Cucchi
County of Stanislaus (2020) 10 Cal.5th 479. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
Rationalizing (?) the Hart and Keller v. EA Sports Publicity Rights Rulings (Guest Blog Post)
5 Aug 2013, 10:25 am by Eric
Capital Cities/ABC, Inc., 255 F.3d 1180 (9th Cir. 2001). [read post]
Technology & Marketing Law Blog - http://blog.ericgoldman.org/
[Eugene Volokh] Freedom of speech vs. right of publicity in sports computer games
2 Feb 2015, 2:56 pm
School of Law) Tyler Ochoa (Santa Clara Univ. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Fifth District Holds EIR For Kern County’s Ministerial Oil and Gas Well Permitting Ordinance Violates CEQA Due To Improperly Deferred Mitigation For Water Supply Impacts, Inadequate Mitigation For Farmland Conversion, And Inadequate Analysis of Noise Impacts
3 Mar 2020, 4:53 pm by Arthur F. Coon
County of Fresno (2018) 6 Cal.5th 502, 513), the Court held it was. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Deep Rig
20 Aug 2010, 3:35 pm
John Deere Co. of Kansas City, 383 U.S. 1, 17-18 (1966), the court must consider (1) the scope and content of the prior art; (2) the difference between the prior art and the claimed invention; (3) the level of ordinary skill in the art; and (4) any objective evidence of nonobviousness. [read post]
Patent Prospector - http://www.patenthawk.com/blog/